1
Energica / Re: Your feedback on the traces on my front brake discs
« on: August 08, 2025, 07:37:41 PM »
It's a (semi) floating rotors. It has some natural play. How are you measuring runout?
|
ElectricMotorcycleForum.com
- September 02, 2026, 12:59:13 AM
- Welcome, Guest
News:
Electric Motorcycle Forum is live!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1] 2
3
Energica / Re: Is there no longer a warranty to void?
« on: May 21, 2025, 06:25:59 PM »
Has anyone removed the AC charger - and had the bike continue to function without errors?
4
Energica / Re: Lifting an eva ribelle for wheels removal
« on: April 12, 2025, 08:57:22 PM »
Generally one doesn't service a sealed wheel bearing. By the time you pull them, and pop the seals to thoroughly clean, you've caused race and seal damage that only accelerates their wear. If sealed bearings have a problem, it's better to just pull and replace.
5
Energica / Re: Dead Energicas in Europe/US? Need parts :)
« on: April 07, 2025, 02:58:41 AM »
Check with member Demoni
https://www.electricmotorcycleforum.com/boards/index.php?topic=13382.msg128909#msg128909
https://www.electricmotorcycleforum.com/boards/index.php?topic=13382.msg128909#msg128909
6
Energica / Re: Energica Ribelle EMCE unstable 12V power supply - PSU/DC-DC converter?
« on: March 02, 2025, 07:56:41 PM »
The Livewire solution just adds more hardware and a reverse problem. The LIVEWIRE OBC circuit that maintains the 12vdc is a failure point, often requiring OBC replacement, and/or 12vdc battery charging, and 12vdc battery replacement.
Using the Livewire12vdc battery for anything more than it's intended purpose of energizing the RESS circuitry at turn on, and running core bike electronics, can add to the problem.
Personally I think the Energica solution is more elegant.
Using the Livewire12vdc battery for anything more than it's intended purpose of energizing the RESS circuitry at turn on, and running core bike electronics, can add to the problem.
Personally I think the Energica solution is more elegant.
7
Energica / Re: Front Brake Master Options
« on: February 25, 2025, 01:53:58 AM »
I think you want to measure your pistons. If you have OEM Energica calipers, I'd expect you have 34mm pistons.
8
Energica / Re: Front Brake Master Options
« on: February 25, 2025, 12:55:34 AM »
That number is a production batch code not a bore size. For instance on my 19, its marked with "22".
Brembo would spec a 19 for a dual caliper 34mm piston setup, and a 17 m/c for a dual 30.
Brembo would say that a 14 is for a single caliper setup and will pull to the handlebar before stopping a dual caliper bike.
Brembo would spec a 19 for a dual caliper 34mm piston setup, and a 17 m/c for a dual 30.
Brembo would say that a 14 is for a single caliper setup and will pull to the handlebar before stopping a dual caliper bike.
9
Energica / Re: Front Brake Master Options
« on: February 24, 2025, 05:46:03 PM »
The Corsa brochure says M4 calipers. But also 32/36 pistons, 108mm bolt spacing, and 7.1 mm rotors. That sure sounds like a GP4.
My bike came with 5mm rotors, and I've moved to 6mm - but I'd never fit 7mm rotors.
Maybe Aaron can chime in....
My bike came with 5mm rotors, and I've moved to 6mm - but I'd never fit 7mm rotors.
Maybe Aaron can chime in....
10
Energica / Re: Front Brake Master Options
« on: February 24, 2025, 05:28:43 PM »
I've a 2023 Ego+ RS. It isn't a Clienti.
The bike has Marzocchi forks and Brembo 20.9883 (left) and 20.9884 (right) monoblock calipers.
The calipers have 100mm bolt spacing and four 34 mm pistons.
I have a 19 M/C.
I thought the Eva and Ego shared brake parts? But maybe a difference in years?
Have you measured your pistons?
The bike has Marzocchi forks and Brembo 20.9883 (left) and 20.9884 (right) monoblock calipers.
The calipers have 100mm bolt spacing and four 34 mm pistons.
I have a 19 M/C.
I thought the Eva and Ego shared brake parts? But maybe a difference in years?
Have you measured your pistons?
11
Energica / Re: Front Brake Master Options
« on: February 24, 2025, 06:42:37 AM »
I think my Ego has 34mm M4 calipers. Does the Ribelle have different hardware?
12
Energica / Re: Insurance coverage... any changes yet?
« on: February 19, 2025, 05:46:40 PM »
No insurance change here.
But why not just ask them how they determine value for a vehicle that is out of production and for which repair parts may be limited?
All insurance companies do it, and it may vary slightly depending on your state, or the country that one is in. In the end, they'll likely just make a determination of fair market value depending on its pre-accident miles, condition and depreciated value....
But why not just ask them how they determine value for a vehicle that is out of production and for which repair parts may be limited?
All insurance companies do it, and it may vary slightly depending on your state, or the country that one is in. In the end, they'll likely just make a determination of fair market value depending on its pre-accident miles, condition and depreciated value....
13
Energica / Re: Good News?
« on: February 19, 2025, 03:57:32 AM »
Energica Latvia must still be in business! 
14
Energica / Re: Engineering Screen for Experia
« on: August 29, 2024, 12:33:16 AM »
"B" is a historically common identifier for Battery voltage.
15
Energica / Re: Must Have Suspension Tool
« on: August 08, 2024, 02:23:59 AM »
I think on forks, the internet gurus run the mm of sag together with the % of compression - without talking about the fact that the fully extended lower fork tube is just that - it's just a reference point not the travel. The fork tubes do not fully compress to the end.
So, for instance, with my Ego+ RS with Marzocchi forks, the fully extended forks measure at about 150mm - but the spec'd travel for the forks is only 4.33" = 110mm
Most of the percent of travel measurements out there seem to be based on the fairly common 110mm of fork travel of many forks.
I'm at the opposite end of the scale though from Smithy - I need heavier fork springs to get to my desired 30mm of front sag.
So, for instance, with my Ego+ RS with Marzocchi forks, the fully extended forks measure at about 150mm - but the spec'd travel for the forks is only 4.33" = 110mm
Most of the percent of travel measurements out there seem to be based on the fairly common 110mm of fork travel of many forks.
I'm at the opposite end of the scale though from Smithy - I need heavier fork springs to get to my desired 30mm of front sag.
Pages: [1] 2