ElectricMotorcycleForum.com

  • September 01, 2026, 10:15:25 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Electric Motorcycle Forum is live!

Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Battery Pack  (Read 2928 times)

Specter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2836
    • View Profile
Battery Pack
« on: December 19, 2025, 06:13:31 AM »

So i just got the battery pack out of a Ribelle that was totaled,  didn't tell me what all happened, just gave me the battery and motor / gearbox for 400 dollars.

what i would like to do is, i have a friend who lets me use his equipment when i do hard core battery work, ie the spot welders or hv gloves and stuff you need to work on this kind of stuff.

i want to rebuild this with a different type of cell in it, there are newer cells out there with better C rates etc etc.
ultimately id love to bump the voltage up about 40 volts ish or so, bit more voltage, open the amps up a bit and might get some extra hp out of it when you really need it on the top end.... anyways.

now obviously the existing software is not going to like that at all, so i guess this question is more for Demoni.

how hard would it be to reprogram with the higher voltages of a different pack?  is this something that a tech could do, maybe with a little bit of engineer help or is it a major evolution,  in other words,  is this pretty much changing a few variables here and there like Cellmax = 364 or something like that or would it be a major evolution and rewrite and not really something that one can do?

would be nice to see energica back and in a few years, maybe developing better products, and id not mind at all contributing to that effort or being the guinea pig to test it :D

right now don't have absolute specifics as to what i will do, but more in the, is this doable, phase.

thank you
Aaron
Logged

Richard230

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9965
    • View Profile
Re: Battery Pack
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2025, 08:26:31 PM »

I assume that you meant to say "400" volts, instead of "40" volts.
Logged
Richard's motorcycle collection:  2018 16.6 kWh Zero S, 2002 Yamaha FZ1 (FZS1000N) and a 1978 Honda Kick 'N Go Senior.

Specter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2836
    • View Profile
Re: Battery Pack
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2025, 10:11:55 PM »

actually 40.  bump it up 40 more   but you could be correct and bump it up TO 400 if i can do so.  have to see the config in the existing pack, and the size of the cells i am considering, how many fit, stuff like that.  not sure what the max voltage the motor can handle, however it probably can handle 400, it probably sees spikes like that when you let on and off the throttle hard.  if the bike faults out at full load, which has happened once or twice, yah im sure it'll take a nasty spike.  the motor controller now ill have to research and see what it can handle.  and the inverter too of course,

the software from what i have seen is pretty complicated, it' be nice if you just had to change one or two values however with as many sub routines and safety stuff etc, i sincerely doubt it's that easy.  doesn't hurt to ask though :)

aaron
Logged

ElectricRebel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
    • View Profile
Re: Battery Pack
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2025, 11:45:29 PM »

So i just got the battery pack out of a Ribelle that was totaled,  didn't tell me what all happened, just gave me the battery and motor / gearbox for 400 dollars.

what i would like to do is, i have a friend who lets me use his equipment when i do hard core battery work, ie the spot welders or hv gloves and stuff you need to work on this kind of stuff.

i want to rebuild this with a different type of cell in it, there are newer cells out there with better C rates etc etc.
ultimately id love to bump the voltage up about 40 volts ish or so, bit more voltage, open the amps up a bit and might get some extra hp out of it when you really need it on the top end.... anyways.

now obviously the existing software is not going to like that at all, so i guess this question is more for Demoni.

how hard would it be to reprogram with the higher voltages of a different pack?  is this something that a tech could do, maybe with a little bit of engineer help or is it a major evolution,  in other words,  is this pretty much changing a few variables here and there like Cellmax = 364 or something like that or would it be a major evolution and rewrite and not really something that one can do?

would be nice to see energica back and in a few years, maybe developing better products, and id not mind at all contributing to that effort or being the guinea pig to test it :D

right now don't have absolute specifics as to what i will do, but more in the, is this doable, phase.

thank you
Aaron

Hello Aaron,

The existing battery consists of 162 Farasis P32 cells in 9 modules.
Each module is made up of 18 cells in a 9S2P config.
3 of these modules are in a row, and three are above each other (See attachments).
You don't need a spot welder for pouch cells, they can be clamped (Like Energica does on the Bikes) with holes in the cell tabs and bolts.
You have around 350 mm between the rear plate of the battery pack and a separation plate that holds some of the BMS boards.
You could use the newer Farasis P58 (see attachment), you also need a "compression foam" between the Cells (Like Norseal PF100).
You could squeeze around 33 cells per row, 99 in total into the existing battery. Giving you 22,1 REAL total kWh, 410V maximum @ 4,15V/ Cell, 366V Nominal; @6,5C and nominal voltage that would be 144kW of output power. At higher volatges that would be even higher ...
But you'd need a complete new BMS, Software etc...

Kind regards from Germany
Jonas
Logged
2020 Energica EVA Ribelle

Specter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2836
    • View Profile
Re: Battery Pack
« Reply #4 on: December 21, 2025, 06:52:00 AM »

Thank you Electric Rebel, ive seen the guts before but was not sure if they made changes over the years between batteries, diff cells, diff configuration etc. so didn't commit to one 'fix' as im still researching a few diff batteries.
Energica bolts their batteries  i believe, at those power levels, spot welding is pretty much out of the picture.   bolting, soldering or maybe laser welding would work.  bolting much more logical as soldering at those voltages ehh, no thanks. specially when you have to take things apart to replace defective inner pieces.

Lets throw some numbers out that I pulled out of my ass, after I removed my head.

lets say they have 162 20ah cells that can do 5c each, pushing harder is asking for issues. lets say these batteries take up 1 unit of space each.

fast forward to today. there are better cells out there now. they can take a bit more of a beating, lets say 8 c.

lets say these new cells you get a slightly smaller capacity one to take up only  0.8 units of space each. .. that makes room for ehh 30 to 32 additional cells in the same space. in series thats more voltage.
lets say these new cells are good up to 8C discharge.  Even if they were only 16ah cells, because of physical smaller, the higher amp allowed -C draw still overall gives a 25 percent-ish power increase.

raw terms, higher voltage at same amps = more power and you are not taxing the amp limits of the controller, inverter or the motor (IF they can handle what your higher voltage is, which i think they should, or find one that can, after working in robotics for years as well as the power plant, it's easy to find drivers / servos / controllers / vfd's in almost any power level and configuration you need.  you might need to change the inverter/vfd out, but controller and motor should be ok.

of course the bms and software is going to need to be changed, it's gonna have fits, that's a no brainer.. WHICH is why I am hoping that possibly i t's just setting new max values for variables, in the software, and not a bunch of nuanced sifting thru 800 subroutines of code trying to find each instance of working with voltage to change the number... pretty sure it's a universal variable, but after working on GE's nightmare garbage for 40 years, ive learned to not trust a thing to be built 'logically' anymore :).

as for bms, they tend to be modularized.  so you add another board to handle the extra P arm, daisy chain it in with a finger to the one next to it to keep board voltages balanced and you should be good to go, unless each board has to talk to each other, which i hope is not the case.  of course you have to look at energica software,  if they have a boards = 9 somewhere and you now have it at 10, that could be an issue somewhere else (hence the sift the code part).  if they are using absolute memory cell addressing, that extra digit/byte can cause a big problem, ie more rewriting.  no it's not going to be a simple feat i do not think.

other problem comes when changing stuff, it all has to talk to each other and re marry it all, that will be a bear w/o the programmer and it's much better to do that with a proper entry into the software instead of a hack that you are not sure is showing you all levels.

if its something that energica could do lickety split, awesome, i send bike back to san fran again, if not, then umm, oof, ok, was worth a try.

they have their own unique code that is immediately clear, but after working on symphony / harmony / mk V / mk VI,  Siemens plc, ladder logic / bcd / hex / octal / slc 500 /can bus / modbus/  serial / null modem / bla bla bla i don't think ill have too many issues figuring it out... they all kind of work pretty much the same even with the idiosyncroties 

does it void the warranty ,hell yeah no worries ill sign the waiver  8)

Aaron

i wish i had a few million dollars, id have bought the company myself, and guess what the first (ok maybe 3rd) project would have been.
Logged

DerKrawallkeks

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 257
    • View Profile
Re: Battery Pack
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2025, 11:26:36 PM »

Hello Aaron,

it's nice you're excitced, but there is just so much wrong here, I will not bother to explain everything.

Here is some info (and opinion):
- The BMS is the s-BMS made by Lithium Balance
- The config software is s-BMS PRO: 100640.99 for about 1500 $ (here's the manual, see for yourself https://lithiumbalance.com/wp-content/uploads/LiBAL-s-BMS-PRO%E2%84%A2.pdf)
- all BMS slaves are connected in a daisy-chain, electrically they're all meant to be (and are!) in series
- don't "wire anything in parallel" unless you really mean to. It is generally avoided in HV batteries to parallel any strings
- I'd love to see the cell replacement happen, but it's way way harder than you imagine right now. You'll have to find cells that fit in C-rate, capacity, physically, and in terms of contacting. Then you'll have to design this new package and build it, which requires dangerous steps, and the end result must be flawless, since it is a high power battery pack.

From my experience in prototype HV battery pack development, I think you're most likely looking at best case 3-6 month project (full time, if you're an experienced engineer).

Keep us updated if you go for it!
Logged

Specter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2836
    • View Profile
Re: Battery Pack
« Reply #6 on: December 22, 2025, 07:54:57 PM »

Thank you for the inputs.
i am experienced in batteries, some design, not walking in totally blind, know what's in store for me, and yes months of design could be in front of me, luckily though a lot of that has already been done by people much smarter than me.  I really just need to modify slightly, (or maybe not so slightly) stuff that already works.. but the big thing is,  KEEP it working with the new specs.

Energica's stuff all talks to each other, including the bms to the other 'brains' of the bike,  BMS are simple in concept, as you said, those eggs been cracked and are available for purchase.  Where my biggest concern lies is when it has to interface with energica's proprietary code.  'THAT is the bogeyman that will cause the willies.  In theory a bms can and will take care of a battery no matter who or what is looking at it, it's getting that battery to work with it's system that is the issue here.  How is energica's software going to act when i drop in a battery thats at say 380 volts .vs. say 320?

i have not dug thru energica's software as much as id like to, and one concern is layering,  ok fine, you got into one subset, but are  there other layers of control that you are not aware of (because you nae have the password derp!!) that will still lock you out even if you do manage to change some parameters.   Anyone who's familiar with GE's mkv mkvi knows exactly the kind of scenario i am talking about.  and as clever as you think you may be, you can't force the force.

maybe i should just pack it full of 200 C RC lipo's  run it 3 or 4 times, gently set it out in a field, walk away and never touch it again  ;D

aaron
Logged

ElectricRebel

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 43
    • View Profile
Re: Battery Pack
« Reply #7 on: December 26, 2025, 09:38:32 PM »

Thank you for the inputs.
i am experienced in batteries, some design, not walking in totally blind, know what's in store for me, and yes months of design could be in front of me, luckily though a lot of that has already been done by people much smarter than me.  I really just need to modify slightly, (or maybe not so slightly) stuff that already works.. but the big thing is,  KEEP it working with the new specs.

Energica's stuff all talks to each other, including the bms to the other 'brains' of the bike,  BMS are simple in concept, as you said, those eggs been cracked and are available for purchase.  Where my biggest concern lies is when it has to interface with energica's proprietary code.  'THAT is the bogeyman that will cause the willies.  In theory a bms can and will take care of a battery no matter who or what is looking at it, it's getting that battery to work with it's system that is the issue here.  How is energica's software going to act when i drop in a battery thats at say 380 volts .vs. say 320?

i have not dug thru energica's software as much as id like to, and one concern is layering,  ok fine, you got into one subset, but are  there other layers of control that you are not aware of (because you nae have the password derp!!) that will still lock you out even if you do manage to change some parameters.   Anyone who's familiar with GE's mkv mkvi knows exactly the kind of scenario i am talking about.  and as clever as you think you may be, you can't force the force.

maybe i should just pack it full of 200 C RC lipo's  run it 3 or 4 times, gently set it out in a field, walk away and never touch it again  ;D

aaron

Well, we don't want to take you the wind out the sails, BUT:

Lithium Battery (NMC; NCA) design is always a trade-off between some parameters:

-Energy Density
-Power Density
-Cycle life


You can have a very high C rate cell, but it will either have shitty energy density or it will have 300 cycles at best before reaching EOL.
The 120C LiPos I have in my RC plane reach 250 to 320 cycles at most before they arent usable anymore.
If you want more voltage you can either go with the mentioned Farasis P58 cell (60,5 Ah), you wont need to rebuild the battery casing with them, as  they have the same dimensions as the P32 (but its thicker, 10 mm compared to 6), or do a complete redesign of the battery.
The OEM Energica Inverter on the Pre-EMCE bikes can handle 360V to 400V MAX (Cascadia Motion PM100 Series)
So you have to rebuild the whole bikes electrical system to work with higher voltages.
The Motor probably will be fine with the Voltage.

Or you take a different approach altogether:
Stay at 81S; Use the P58 Cell and make the bike lighter (Using 81 of the P58 will decrease weight by 13,2 kg, while the energy stored in your bike will decrease from 19,7 kWh to 18 kWh flat (But only 117kW output)
OR

You redesign the whole battery with farasis P84A cells, giving you 24,42 kWH total, and with their total 6C discharge current you'll end up with 146 kW output of the battery as well.

Just my thoughts

Good Luck
Logged
2020 Energica EVA Ribelle

Specter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2836
    • View Profile
Re: Battery Pack
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2025, 07:35:43 AM »

Thank you, this is the kind of thing i am looking into / considering.  just looking from all directions.  i wont need max energy for 50 miles, hell, maybe only need it for 4 miles type thing.  i won't need 50 miles out of the pack, maybe just 20 type of thing at those kind of power levels.  cell is rated at 6C you really want to obey that, but if you hit it at say 7c for 20 seconds here,  30 seconds here, that won't kill it.  just, number one always, watch the heat. the 30 seconds on 5 minute cool down type thing if you are running that way.

the 200 C thing was being facetious of course you'd not use those, very dangerous to work with imo, especially at those voltage levels. and good for a few hundred cycles tops, and when they DO go bad, not very often do they do so gracefully.  but yes, everything is always a trade off.  That's life.

imagine a 2 mile long road, give it 5 - 10 seconds to twist the throttle up and hold it there, run a mile-ish, then let go of the throttle, and you got the second mile give or take, to slow the thing down in  8).  Depending on the abuse you just dished out, decide if you want more or less regen hitting the steamy battery pack even more.

ideally i don't want to reinvent the entire thing, just stick with tinkering with the battery pack.  your approach with the p84 cells looks  like what im looking to do, that sort of thing, BUT.. there's still energica's software side of things.  at the end of that day, that will be the crux of the whole matter, when you got everything all put back together again, turning the key, pushing the button and that little green GO light comes on.

the 84 looks like a slightly lower voltage too, so hitting that 400 A controller limit, is another issue.

Aaron
Logged

PWM

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 401
    • View Profile
Re: Battery Pack
« Reply #9 on: February 05, 2026, 06:30:01 AM »

This is a good thread...thanks for sharing battery pack internals.

I see opportunity for coolant circuit...replace the cell tab clamp backer plate with a modified one having metallic tube brazed to it while maintaining mechanical and electrical interfaces factory spec.

Planning DIY rebuild in a couple years for My21.5k (1st gen) pack given sourcing Farasis P32B cells is viable and hoping to hear more about the specimens y'all have.

The cell backer plate dimensions would be valuable info to kicking this off in CAD...can you eRebel or aaron publish a step file or send something PM?

Do discrete cell tab backer plates even exist?  Can't tell from teaser pictures sent so guessing on this end.

Imagine...leak proofing (180) tube interfaces (10_cellTabsPerModule, 2x_tubeEnds)...gotta keep electrical isolation is reason why...the thermal transfer is everything and why polytherm tubing w/o tube interfaces is not considered...the cell tab clusters within the modules is where the heat concentrates the closest to each cell.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2026, 11:31:33 AM by PWM »
Logged
BMW eK75 Conversion (Retired)
Energica EVA Ribelle (Black Frame Matters)
Pages: [1]