A friend is a programmer at MicroShaft. When Windoze 11 was to be announced, I asked him if I should be excited.
He gave me a rather subdued NO. I then asked if it was similar to the Vista upgrade. He said not to have my hopes so high.
Somebody once told me there is a reliable pattern for MicroShaft to tell if an OS will be great or junk. It's every other release:
Win ME-Junk
Win XP-good
Win Vista-Junk
Win 7-good
Win 8-Junk
Win 10-good (for those who know how to use it correctly).
So next will be junk (Win 11).
BTW, was there ever a Win 1, 2 , 3, 4, 5, 6 and 9?
-Don- Reno, NV[size=78%] [/size]
95/98/ME would have been 4, XP is 5, Vista is 6. No 9 because it sounded like No in German.
Personally I haven't hated any of the Windows versions and I've used them all starting with 95. I can't say I've regretted any of the upgrades, for me it's always been an improvement to reliability, ease of use, and features with every new version. Perhaps the only exception would be Windows 8 when it would default to the weird start screen that was based off the Xbox OS or some shit, but that was fixed with 8.1 where you could choose to start on a normal desktop.
I've used Mac OS in the past at school and hated it, it wasn't intuitive to use (although some of that will admittedly be down to not getting used to it) and there was annoying shit that bugged me like not being able to just maximise windows, right click (this was a while ago), and the ugly taskbar dock that took up an unnecessary amount of room.
I've used a few versions of Linux before and they've been okay, I just wouldn't use it on regular basis simply because of the lack of compatibility.