Related to evdjerome’s question, if you exceed 1C and the external chargers are plugged into the accessory port will the bike just throttle back its charge tank speed to stay under 1C or will it cut out completely?
IIRC, the battery fuse is 100 amps. 100 amps is 24KW at 240 VAC so you're unlikely to blow it. But the fuse for the DeltaQ charger is less, perhaps 50 amps? Sorry, I am not 100% sure but I think that is correct. Perhaps somebody here can verify.
If you're just a little over 1C, it just means the battery cells will get warmer than they should. Too much of it will be bad for the battery, but I doubt if a little over 1C for a few times will make that big of a difference compared to being just under 1C.
I don't think our Zero BMS will reduce the current for you. But some BMSes in other batteries will.
DonTom, not to flame you, but you have mixed AC and DC amps in the same equation, and calculated 1C incorrectly. Current Zero batteries will not handle 24kW for very long. Also, using *NOMINAL* POWER to calculate what 1C is for a battery is backwards and can convey the wrong information.
Example: A given battery is
28Series
4Parallel with cells that are 29Ah each. The nominal cell voltage from manufacturer is 3.65Vpc_nom (not 3.7Vpc_nom) and the maximum specified cell voltage is 4.15Vpc_max (not 4.2Vpc_max).
This means the battery is 29Ah*4P=116Ah. 1C should be accomplished by charging the battery at 116Amps for 1 hour. 116Amps should be the stated charging limit of this battery pack.
Engineer A calculates the battery is 3.65Vpc_nom*28S=102.2V_nom (average throughout SoC calculated in cell laboratory)
and further 102.2V_nom*116Ah = 11855.2Wh_nom = ~11.8kWh_nom (useful energy)
Marketer B likes bigger numbers and calculates (4.15Vpc_max*28S)*116Ah = ~13.4max_kWh (which means nothing to anyone but tax officials)
Consumer C often takes 11800Wh_nom or even worse 13400Wh_max and assumes that this power amount constantly would be equivalent to 1C constant throughout the charge.
The battery near 0% (near low voltage cut-off 0% not true zero) is around 3.0Vpc*28S=84V_empty.
The battery near 100% is around 4.15Vpc_max*28S=116.2V_max.
11.8kWh_nom/84V_empty= ~140.48Amps voiding the battery warranty by going above the real 1C of 116Amps!11.8kWh_nom/116.2V_max=101.55A which is under 1C constant rate.So in this case Consumer C would have temporarily went over the specified battery charging limit at any low State-of-Charge (SoC) and then charged at under what the battery is technically capable of at high SoC, just to stay at their nominal (or average) charge power rating. Consumer C made charging power constant but not the amps which is the standard charging profile for lithium batteries (CC/CV).
I used numbers from memory for the 2016 model year and they may be wrong, but the example should still be good to illustrate the dangers associated with assumptions/calculations based on nominal power. I believe the 2016 is actually 28Ah but IIRC some are stamped 29Ah or something. The engineers seem to use the 28 figure in their calculations because my numbers match the Zero datasheet when I use it. I used 29Ah in the example for clarity sake to not mix up with the 28S even though it is likely incorrect for any specific zero battery. People have charged Zero's well over 1C before. It should void the warranty. I'm not a battery expert and these amounts (Ah) may technically need to change as the battery ages and recalculates its own capacity (even new from the factory Zero may not use the Farasis laboratory cell data/spec for Zero's pack encapsulated in resin meaning we are all at too high of a rate). Also sorry I've forgotten all my significant figures rules with calculations.
Oh yeah, my bike reports itself as 104Ah since new, despite me calculating 112Ah for the 16SR:
See
https://electricmotorcycleforum.com/boards/index.php?topic=8940.0