One thing that seems to get forgotten in the car/bike battery question is the amount of energy used to move the rider ( the actual concern) versus the amount needed to move the entire vehicle AND rider.
The ratio of the weight of car to payload is just ridiculous. That was just bought home to me when I looked at the GM car in the new battery announcement. It is ridiculously HUGE!
Even allowing for the greater relative higher drag of bike/rider ( even the best faired street capable bike) and pretty much any car, the extra weight carried around by a car is gigantic. Most of it doesn't actually do anything. Any weight of battery will at least not be carrying unnecessary extra.
Doug S. Some of us like the carrot juice approach. I want a bike I can use smart, not a show piece with masses of power I cannot use without losing my licence. If I want speed and ultimate handling , I want range as well. That means ICE for the time being. I have an MT07 for that. I don't want to live in a world that is ONLY carrot juice and kale. But I need them ( OK NOT kale, it's aweful). In a revised Mazlow's heirarchy of need , a supercommuter is above a sports electric bike in my case. For me a supercommuter is a tool, and a superbike a toy to play with.
My need is a need. A bike that can carry me into town and back. Starting and finishing at 100kph, and the rest at town speeds. I can charge it from my solar array during the day for power. And one I can afford, which means made in China or India or Thailand, I would think. Anything made in the USA will be way overpriced once it hits Australia. As Zero found out, selling in Aus is just too costly.