ElectricMotorcycleForum.com

  • September 02, 2026, 03:09:45 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Electric Motorcycle Forum is live!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Redblade

Pages: [1] 2
1
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Ahhhhhhhh Heated Grips
« on: August 27, 2019, 03:43:20 AM »
The heated grips felt like a joke to me. Kind of keep your palms warm, but the back of your hands (the part that suffers the worst) don't feel any better.

2
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 600mi service on SRF
« on: August 07, 2019, 03:25:27 AM »
Cheaper to maintain "obviously" if you keep the bike for close to 100,000 miles. This bikes most direct competitor is the MT-09...which is 10k less. 100k miles of fuel on the MT-09 at 50mpg and $2.30 a gallon will cost you $4,600 and you can do most of the maintenance yourself for under $50 a service interval. You cannot commission a Zero SR/F motor yourself, which seems to run about $175 an interval...adding up to over $2,000 over the course of 100,000 miles.

I'm sure the MT-09 has some high mileage expensive maintenance costs...but you are still starting out 10k ahead.

I would love to compare the SR/F to a top quality motorcycle, but that just doesn't make any sense. The fit and finish of this bike are subpar. I have panel gaps all over my SR/F, great looking bike...but the quality isn't there.

3
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 600mi service on SRF
« on: August 06, 2019, 05:24:28 PM »
I'm more than a little skeptical that anyone would buy an SR/F to save money :)
If they bought a SR/F instead of  LiveWire, they saved quite a bit! :)

-Don-  Auburn, NV

ok....then why do people insist on mentioning cost savings vs an ICE bike? Why does the argument always change when facts are brought into play?

People talk about performance, and then when performance numbers are put side by side an ICE bike...suddenly performance doesn't matter
Maintenance is brought up, but then it costs just as much as an ICE bike...suddenly maintenance costs don't matter.

Seriously, EV owners sound like flat earthers to me at this point.

4
So many people brag about Zero speed...yet it isn't better than bikes that cost less than half of what an SR/F does. And then when that fact is pointed out, most people seem to resort to "but it isn't about 0-60 or quarter mile...those aren't even realistic!"

Sometimes I think EV riders are flat earthers as well..

5
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 600mi service on SRF
« on: August 05, 2019, 08:02:54 AM »
Yesterday I had the brake fluid and coolant replaced in my BMW R1200RS. Those two service items cost $342.  In 1500 miles I will need the 24K mile service. I bet that will set me back around $800.  So I have no complaints about the cost of servicing my Zero, every 8K miles or so. It is a lot cheaper than servicing an ICE motorcycle of similar performance.

That is a terrible comparison, an SR/F doesn't really compare with top of the line motorcycles...besides in price. I think a more fitting comparison would be the 2019 Yamaha MT-09. Similar performance (actually better 0-60 with the MT-09) and the cost is under 9k. That gives you over 10k money saved up to spend on maintenance for probably over a decade before you even reach the price of the SR/F. You can do the oil changes yourself every 5k miles for under $30 and save the big maintenance for the shop.

6
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 600mi service on SRF
« on: August 05, 2019, 01:36:32 AM »
But the cost is similar...I don't care if it is less maintenance if the price is the same. I also would be concerned about the warranty being voided if the commissioning isn't accomplished.

7
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 600mi service on SRF
« on: August 05, 2019, 01:20:52 AM »
You do realize I have an SR/F right? And every 8k miles is about when I service my ICE bikes as well...you aren't very bright.

8
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 600mi service on SRF
« on: August 05, 2019, 12:19:23 AM »
So wait a minute...I was constantly sold on the "zero" maintenance aspect of these bikes...and now it turns out you have to get the motor commissioned all the time? My regular services for my ICE bikes and slingshot were always around $175...and now I am looking at still spending that on this zero that is way less capable? That is a bummer.

9
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Whining about service..
« on: July 10, 2019, 07:13:09 PM »
Damn, flat tire sounds like he needs to get laid. What an asshole.

10
Quote

I'm in the same exact boat as you. I've always liked that Zero had staying power, but I honestly hate all of their bikes. I saw the SR/F on the website and thought "now that is more like it, probably won't buy it tho". Stopped in the dealer and saw it in person, traded my harley in and ordered on the spot.

Same here. Had been thinking about buying an electric motorcycle for years. Never really liked what was out there, both, performance-wise and looks.
When I read the specs and early reviews on the SR/F, decided it was time. Went to the dealer and they had sold their demo so I could not try one.
Put a deposit and was told minimum 3 months.

Not happy about that long wait, started to browse the internet and found a dealer in the north east that sold me their demo with only 50 miles.
Was a bit worried about buying a bike so expensive without first riding it for a bit but decided to do it anyways and I am glad I did.

It is easy to love that machine: much better looking that most previous Zeros and then all that instant, quiet and plentiful torque at your disposal.

I like it now more than when I first got it as it's becoming quieter and softer on the suspension and the rear brake is biting better, as I put miles on it.

The only thing I don't like is the forward-leaning riding position but this is primarily due to my back and shoulders hurting due to an injury many moons ago.
I am in the middle of replacing the handlebar with a Pro Taper Evo Adventure (high model) and I am sure after that I will be sitting in the right position for me.

Nice, I almost wish I could've purchased the demo bike from my dealer, this wait has been killing me. Can't wait to hear about how the raised handlebar worked out for you.

11
I think some of you guys miss the point of this bike. It is not intended, I believe, to appeal to existing Zero customers. It is not intended for long range or economical commuting, though my early testing seems to show it matches Zero's range claims if ridden carefully. This bike is clearly targeted at people riding ICE sportsbikes or streetfighters in urban environments today. People like me.

I am enthralled with my new SR/F. I never seriously considered buying a Zero before even though I drive electric cars and admire what Zero has done in the past. Generally I found riding the earlier Zeros to be boring. I just got back from a 30 mile blast at about 3/4 hooligan mode and it was absolutely wonderful. Doing range/energy consumption testing yesterday along with a test Level 2 charge while I was out I found I can easily travel efficiently to nearby country roads where I can let it loose a bit and still get a charge to make it home.

I'm in the Dallas/Fort Worth area where charging options are maybe more scarce than in other parts of the country, certainly less than in Europe. This bike will bring in hundreds of new riders with different priorities than someone who might rather have an S or DSR. Making the riding position more relaxed or adding a heavier battery would reduce the appeal of the SR/F to me and other new Zero customers.

Today Zero is swamped with orders, reportedly stopping production on all other bikes to meet the demand. They have a hit on their hands. I would expect the DSR to get a similar upgrade soon (and the SR to be cancelled). Some people won't be happy with the SR/F. Those people aren't the target market.

I'm in the same exact boat as you. I've always liked that Zero had staying power, but I honestly hate all of their bikes. I saw the SR/F on the website and thought "now that is more like it, probably won't buy it tho". Stopped in the dealer and saw it in person, traded my harley in and ordered on the spot.

12
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Zero SR-F Order thread
« on: July 06, 2019, 01:50:32 AM »
Thanks for the reply, enjoy the ride!

13
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Zero SR-F Order thread
« on: July 05, 2019, 03:56:05 PM »
They got an email on Saturday that it had shipped Thursday. The truck arrived Tuesday morning when they opened (closed Monday).
Delivery charge was $720

What day did you order your SR/F Bill?

14
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Zero SR-F Order thread
« on: June 23, 2019, 11:54:15 AM »
The problem is, people will still complain about the range and charge time. The lightning solves both of those problems..for the most part. DC isn't perfect, but it is better than banking on the 12Kw. Making the SR/F with the Lightning Carbons battery, lvl 3 charging and selling it closer to 16-17k would probably have a lot of ICE bike riders consider buying it.

Or better yet, Tesla should just buy Zero and rebadge them. That would boost sales and give us access to all the tesla charging infrastructure.
DC would be the way to go if it were more common. That means 100% of the charger is on the street, not in your bike. Bike would be lighter with no on-board charger and no charging accessories needed, other than perhaps a high current DC charger at home.

But before you go for the DC charging, be sure you know where you can charge.

Elon Musk has already said that Tesla will NOT get into the motorcycle business. I heard he was almost killed on a motorcycle  and doesn't really care much for them from then on.

But for now, the J1772 AC outlets are perhaps the most common--and often free to use, especially here in the Reno area, but that means the charger must be in the vehicle (or carried).

But I don't find it to be a big deal, in most cases. The slower AC charging just means better planning is necessary.  And I kinda enjoy the forced breaks to charge, in many cases.

If I am going on a real long trip to the middle of nowhere, I will not consider any E-motocycle. At least not in my lifetime. Maybe someday they will have a very common DC standard for all EVs, which will make them much more popular.

Perhaps the sales of the SR/F will make Zero a larger company--and then be able to buy out Lightning and be even larger!

-Don-  Reno, NV

I'm hoping the SR/F does wonders for Zero, it seems like they sold a lot more than they anticipated. Looking forward to the future. Hard to trust anything Elon Musk says, he's kind of a nutjob sometimes. I doubt they will get into bikes either way tho....the lightning merger would be great.

15
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Zero SR-F Order thread
« on: June 23, 2019, 11:17:10 AM »
Ah my bad, did not notice, but I don't really want to keep throwing more and more money to a bike that is already over 20k. There are plenty of DC stations, not many in my area but they are expanding. Plus the range is already better at a cheaper price. Not sure what voltage it needs.

Either way, I'm hoping the Lightning is as good as it sounds on paper, because I will be trading in my SR/F if there is a lightning dealer that opens up within a reasonable distance from me. On paper it is better than the SR/F in almost every way.
IMO, anything new and expensive means we  will usually throw more money at it.  We can have much better luck when we buy used and often get a few extras with the deal.

But I was wondering what voltage and what type of DC chargers the lightning can use. 

I only find the Tesla Superchargers when it comes to DC, but I don't look for anything else and rarely even those. 99% of my charging is done at home on any of my EVs.

-Don-  Reno, NV

True, but won't find a used SR/F for a bit. DC's are growing in number, the 12Kw may never even happen. Would have to look into the Lightning more to see what type of DC charging they use. I wish Lightning and Zero were working together because I think combined they could've had a true winner this year.

More people are buying streetfighters nowadays, seems to be the growing trend vs buying supersport bikes. So that is a plus for Zero, along with the ABS, stability control, and smart technology.

The problem is, people will still complain about the range and charge time. The lightning solves both of those problems..for the most part. DC isn't perfect, but it is better than banking on the 12Kw. Making the SR/F with the Lightning Carbons battery, lvl 3 charging and selling it closer to 16-17k would probably have a lot of ICE bike riders consider buying it.

Or better yet, Tesla should just buy Zero and rebadge them. That would boost sales and give us access to all the tesla charging infrastructure.

Pages: [1] 2