Ah my bad, did not notice, but I don't really want to keep throwing more and more money to a bike that is already over 20k. There are plenty of DC stations, not many in my area but they are expanding. Plus the range is already better at a cheaper price. Not sure what voltage it needs.
Either way, I'm hoping the Lightning is as good as it sounds on paper, because I will be trading in my SR/F if there is a lightning dealer that opens up within a reasonable distance from me. On paper it is better than the SR/F in almost every way.
IMO, anything new and expensive means we will usually throw more money at it. We can have much better luck when we buy used and often get a few extras with the deal.
But I was wondering what voltage and what type of DC chargers the lightning can use.
I only find the Tesla Superchargers when it comes to DC, but I don't look for anything else and rarely even those. 99% of my charging is done at home on any of my EVs.
-Don- Reno, NV
True, but won't find a used SR/F for a bit. DC's are growing in number, the 12Kw may never even happen. Would have to look into the Lightning more to see what type of DC charging they use. I wish Lightning and Zero were working together because I think combined they could've had a true winner this year.
More people are buying streetfighters nowadays, seems to be the growing trend vs buying supersport bikes. So that is a plus for Zero, along with the ABS, stability control, and smart technology.
The problem is, people will still complain about the range and charge time. The lightning solves both of those problems..for the most part. DC isn't perfect, but it is better than banking on the 12Kw. Making the SR/F with the Lightning Carbons battery, lvl 3 charging and selling it closer to 16-17k would probably have a lot of ICE bike riders consider buying it.
Or better yet, Tesla should just buy Zero and rebadge them. That would boost sales and give us access to all the tesla charging infrastructure.