ElectricMotorcycleForum.com

  • September 02, 2026, 12:51:57 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Electric Motorcycle Forum is live!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - webster

Pages: [1]
1
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 2017 DSR real world mileage
« on: June 29, 2017, 09:04:16 AM »
Thanks for the response. 60 miles sounds about right compared to the 30 miles on my FX. I wish Zero would post more accurate numbers.

2
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / 2017 DSR real world mileage
« on: June 25, 2017, 02:25:15 AM »
Hello I own a 2015 Zero FX. When I bought the FX the worst reported mileage (hard sport mode ridding) from Zero was 70 miles combined. I have never been able to get more than 30 miles out of it and have ran out of battery power twice. I'm 205 lbs and like to ride aggressive. I love the bike but 30 miles doesn't get me far. I'm looking into upgrading to a DSR or maybe the SR depending on which one I like best after a test ride. I'm more of a sport rider and not interested in the added weight of the power tank accessary. Zero has drastically lowered the mileage estimates on the newer bikes. The worst mileage reported is at 70 miles for the DSR and 81 for the SR. I'm concerned if I buy the DSR I will only get 50 miles out of it on a full charge. I only ride in sport mode and don't use a motorcycle for commuting. Are there any DSR owners out there who can comment on the mileage in sport mode? I keeping positive that I don't have to buy a gas powered motorcycle.

3
I'm 6'4" also. The FX fits me perfect, but it's more like a motocross bike thin, tall and light. The range is limited, but it's off the charts for fun factor. I test rode the SR and loved the powerful acceleration, but it's on the small side and the front end does not come up like the FX. If your buying new I would go for the DSR because of the taller riding position and wider bars. It's the same motor as the SR and you can put more street worthy tires for better corning performance. The S and SR are the same size, but after ridding the SR forget about it. The same holds true for the DS and DSR.

4
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Getting Skinny - FX & FXS diets?
« on: January 21, 2016, 02:03:16 AM »
Mr. Dude you are correct. I really wanted the FXS just for the IPM motor, but I got a killer deal on a demo 2015 FX. Plus I ride in the dirt and didn't need 17" wheels.

5
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Getting Skinny - FX & FXS diets?
« on: January 20, 2016, 08:59:25 AM »
Keep in mind that the FXS has the newer IPM motor that does not overheat. FX does not. I bought a 2015 because the motor is the same. The 2016 will give you about 5 miles more range. I ride mine pretty hard and always in sport mode and never get more than 30 miles.

6
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Zero FX vs KTM 500 EXC
« on: December 14, 2015, 01:42:18 AM »
I just purchased a demo 2015 FX. I have been riding motocross bikes for over 20 yrs. The biggest issue I have is the limited range and power reduction when the motor gets hot but the fun factor and being very quite make it a blast to ride. Especially in areas where noise is an issue. Being able to ride it fast around you're home is a huge plus. The KTM 500 is a better overall dirt bike, but the FX is better on the street plus you won't piss off the neighbors.

7
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Zero FX fender eliminator kit
« on: November 06, 2015, 03:01:22 AM »
I would like to install a fender eliminator kit on my 2015 Zero FX. Has anyone had any experience with this and know where I can purchase one? I looked at several web sites but could not find any specific kits for Zero. If anyone has done this please send pics.

8
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 2016 FXS
« on: October 22, 2015, 01:06:17 AM »
Are you listening Zero?? People want the FX model with the IPM motor. It seams that it would be easier for you guys in manufacturing to deal with one platform. Just change wheels and the front fork for the FSX.

9
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 2016 FXS
« on: October 20, 2015, 10:43:24 PM »
The front fork on the FSX has been lowered by 1.6 inches. The stock 21 inch front FX wheel may not work with the FSX fork. You should be able to run a 19 inch front wheel. I would contact Zero to confirm before purchasing your new ride. Swapping out the rear wheel with the belt drive might be more of a hassle than it's worth. 

10
I have also been waiting for the new IPM motor on the 2016 FX. Unfortunately I have confirmed that it is only available on the new FXS. This new motor has greater thermal capabilities and will not overheat when ridden aggressively. I wanted the new motor for the FX model because I would like to spend some time riding off-road. It doesn't make sense that zero is offering two different motors for basically the same Bike model.

If you plan on riding mostly in the street the FXS is a great option. The 17 inch wheels are much better for the street and yes the bike will still wheelie. Super Moto bikes are really fun to ride. Front suspension has also been lowered by 1.6 inches on the FSX model. Off-road riding on the FSX will be limited. I'm going to wait it out till mid 2016 to see if Zero will stop production of their old FX motor design. Maybe the new FSX motor will start showing up in late 2016 FX models.

11
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Zero FX 2014 Overheating Motor
« on: September 06, 2015, 06:26:44 AM »
This overheating issue sounds serious. I'm looking into purchasing a 2015 FX, but might wait until Zero resolves issue. Maybe the 2016 model will have an updated improved motor. Has anyone else experienced this quick overheating issues on their FX? I don't mind if it overheats after an hour of hard riding but after a few rounds around a track is unacceptable. :-\

12
Wow that really sucks. Please keep us posted on how Zero handles this issue. I'm ready to pull the trigger on a new 2015 FX, but I'm going to wait and see how Zero responds. I'm surprised they did'nt hand deliver a new FX to your doorstep after 2 major issues with their products??? :(

13
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: 2015 Zero FX vs SR
« on: May 24, 2015, 11:45:53 PM »
Yes the FX is about 125 lbs. lighter which is huge especially when riding in the dirt. The salesman said because of it's light weight around 280 lbs this is why it's so quick and nimble. I do like the looks of the DS better than the SR, but it's to slow. The SR and FX are definitely Zero's fastest accelerating bikes. The shop where I test rode it had a customer who bought an SR and put DS tires and bars so he could ride it in the dirt. I heard that Zero is working on releasing a similar model called the DSR. "Hello" SR acceleration on a DS…this could be interesting?

14
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / 2015 Zero FX vs SR
« on: May 24, 2015, 03:25:28 AM »
I'm new to the forum and very new to E-bikes. Just needed some advise and feedback. I'm over 6 feet 3 inches and weigh around 215 lbs. I test rode the 2015 SR and FX back to back and loved both. The SR feels more planted and solid on the street than the FX. It was also faster once rolling. From a dead stop they were pretty close. I have a motocross background which is why I liked the FX riding position, looks, seat height and handlebars . The FX is also very easy to lift the front end and I can take it in the dirt. Range is not an issue with either bike. If I went with the FX ridding would be 80% street and 20% dirt. My gut tells me to go with the SR because I love the massive torque. The SR has so much torque it's addictive. I liked it better than any ICE street bike I've ridden to date. I know these bikes are different FX enduro and SR pure street bike only. Any feedback would be appreiated.  :D

Pages: [1]