ElectricMotorcycleForum.com

  • September 02, 2026, 07:56:07 AM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Electric Motorcycle Forum is live!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Zoom

Pages: [1]
1
When I got my SR/F, I would hear a groaning buzz like that under moderate to hard acceleration for the first few hundred miles.  I read a post on here by a Zero employee that noted it was normal and would slowly resolve itself after some break-in.  Sure enough, by 500 miles it had improved a lot, and after my first service (which involved removing the rear wheel to patch a bit of tire damage.) it was better still.

I would guess it's a belt tension thing, and I would probably bug my shop about it.

2
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Questions to SRF owners
« on: August 25, 2019, 06:38:01 AM »
36 front and back on the SR/F.  The manual is actually available online if you're curious about other stuff like that.

Funny story: My bike was feeling a little squirmy, and it dawned on me that I hadn't checked the pressure since I took delivery about 2 weeks prior.  Gave it a check and, surprise, I found my rear tire was dangerously low.  In less than 500 miles I'd managed to get a slow leak courtesy of some random ass piece of metal in the road.

3
I just had my first service performed today (a Saturday) at SF moto.  I think they're the biggest zero dealer besides hollywood electrics and have a lot of experience servicing them.  Took under an hour, the didn't have to call zero or order a cable or any nonsense.  I asked the tech about the commissioning process and he said it was different but simpler than previous zeros and basically automatic.  They'd done quite a few already.

So maybe call your service center before and make sure they know what they're doing?

4
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Questions to SRF owners
« on: August 18, 2019, 06:34:58 AM »
Your local dealer is probably going to charge exactly MSRP.  I wouldn't expect much wiggle room, unless you're buying a demo bike.  In CA, my premium SR/F was a bit over 24k OTD.

5
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: SR/F front brake "click"
« on: August 13, 2019, 12:26:12 PM »
That's reassuring.  I think I was overthinking it, I hit a pretty gnarly pothole today and then began to notice this sound, couldn't recall if it was always there, and my brain began to run wild. :)

6
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / SR/F front brake "click"
« on: August 13, 2019, 09:35:59 AM »
To any other SR/F owners:

I've put about 300 miles on mine and noticed today a firm clicking sound when the front brake is applied at low speed, coming from the rotor or caliper.  Honestly it might have always been doing this and I didn't notice until now.  If the bike is stationary, there's no sound when squeezing the brake, but If I'm rolling slowly in my garage it will ca-clack when I grab it.  Above say, 15-20mph, I don't think it happens or I can't hear it.  I did some googling on the subject and I've seen riders of other bikes describe something similar and write it off to expected behavior (pads moving slightly?)

I'll be bringing it in for it's 600 mile service soon anyway and will have it examined, but if anyone else has the same sound that would be reassuring.  At least braking performance still seems powerful as ever.

Edit: on further inspection, it could also be coming from the front shocks?  Hard to tell.

7
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: SR/F - Fun
« on: July 31, 2019, 01:20:32 AM »
Nice, I was considering bar end mirrors too.  Those are CRG Arrows, right?  Did you need the separate adapter those guys make, or did you have everything you need in the box?

8
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: SR/F observations and questions
« on: July 10, 2019, 10:41:29 PM »
Those range values do sound bad, though any period of 85mph+ speeds are absolutely going to rip through your battery.  Speed vs. consumption is always a steep curve with EVs.  If it’s not too personal, could you post your weight?  The rider is a significant contributor to the overall mass the bike has to move, so I’m a bit curious.

9
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: SR/F complaints
« on: June 07, 2019, 12:21:52 PM »
I'm surprised to hear folks say they don't like the seating position.  I got a chance to sit on one recently and it felt very standard/upright to me, and rather comfortable.My only complaint is that mine isn't in my garage yet. :)
Motorcycles are not "one size fits all."   I am kinda long legged. But comfort on an electric motorcycle is not all that important,  IMO, as we usually cannot  go hundreds of miles at a time with out a nice long rest stop to recharge.

-Don-  Auburn, CA

I guess what I meant is it just didn't feel that different from my zero S.  I'd read some impressions that had me braced for a bigger difference.

10
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: SR/F complaints
« on: June 07, 2019, 08:41:28 AM »
I'm surprised to hear folks say they don't like the seating position.  I got a chance to sit on one recently and it felt very standard/upright to me, and rather comfortable.

My only complaint is that mine isn't in my garage yet. :)

11
Agreed, now that I've watched the video, the clips he's chosen are mostly tame save for a couple blasts up to what may have been triple digits.  The written review mentioned some more aggressive testing that we don't see in the video.  I don't doubt he had the thing over 100mph at some point during his lengthy ride, but as for average speed who knows?  It's definitely possible that real world range on these is under what zero is advertising, but I'd wait for more folks to do tests like these before jumping to conclusions.

Just like all zeroes, range is going to be a deal breaker for some riders.  For others, they'll need the optional power tank to squeeze out enough for the riding they're used to.  For me, the range is fine for what I'll be doing.  Until we get much more energy-dense battery tech, the balance between weight, performance, and looks are going to ask us to compromise.

12
Zero claims only 82 miles at a sustained 70mph, so something in the 60's if you're really flogging it sounds unsurprising.  It seems like everyone who's had a chance to ride one of these (press or customers alike) immediately wants to find an open stretch of road and pin the throttle to see how fast they can hit 100+.  I'm sure it's a hoot, but is that really what you'd call "real world" mileage?  Every sprint up to triple digits is going to wolf down battery like there's no tomorrow.  For more law-abiding riding, I expect zero's estimates will be accurate.

13
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: Zero SR-F Order thread
« on: May 08, 2019, 01:14:45 AM »
Talked to a dealer in northern CA who said they'd ordered 4 bikes (2 demos and 2 to sell) and had been told originally that they'd get them May 1st.  When that date came and went, they talked to zero and were told it would now be by June 1st, and that they were "a couple hundred bikes behind" in production.

Also, just got an email from zero's mailing list this morning saying they were "now shipping", so I guess things are moving?

14
Zero Motorcycles Forum | 2013+ / Re: New rider and delivery time
« on: July 30, 2014, 10:34:35 PM »
I just bought an 8.5 zero S from mission motorcycles this month - they don't carry the smaller battery on their floor, will probably try to talk you into the larger battery, but are still happy to order one in the spec you want.  Geographically they are the closest dealer to where these bikes are built, so it shouldn't take long to get one fresh off the assembly line.  From writing a check to getting my 8.5 delivered at my home took about a week and a half.

It is an easy bike for a new rider to handle due to the lack of shifting and smooth, predictable power delivery.  Is it inevitable that you'll drop it or crash?  Not necessarily.  Self-inflicted crashes are often the product of either inexperience or recklessness.  Everyone is inexperienced at some point, but being reckless is optional.  I'll admit that in 9 years my sole incident was when I had only 10 miles under my belt - a bicycle surprised me by ignoring a 4-way stop while I turned left through the intersection, and my novice brain grabbed the brakes hard mid-turn.  I was leaning too far to stop so suddenly and ended up laying it down at 0mph, mangling my clutch lever and nothing else.  100% my fault, as maintaining control or anticipating the bikes behavior was totally possible, but my instincts were still clumsy.  Had that test been sprung on me even a week of practice later I might have fared better, but you're taking a gamble every time you get on a public road, ready or not. 

You might drop your brand new expensive bike, or not.  Who knows?  Get some insurance and some quality riding gear, don't try anything careless and you'll probably be fine.

15
Another +1 for a zero as an easy bike to ride.  I used to ride traditional bikes as my sole transportation, then got a car and stopped riding for a few years, but recently wanted to get back into it.  Test rode a Ducati and was instantly reminded about all the annoying parts of motorcycling - the smell, vibration, having to wrangle the clutch and throttle in harmony or experience a less-than-perfect ride... not to mention the maintenance.  It was frankly unpleasant, and I was about to dismiss riding altogether until I remembered zero.

A zero by comparison is pretty fool-proof.  The throttle is direct and exciting, but not twitchy.  It does what you expect every time, without complaint about the weather or how long the bike has sat since your last ride.  Only downside is that they're expensive compared to a lot of alternatives, but the riding/owning experience is superior, so I say go for it if the cost isn't a stretch for you.

Pages: [1]