ElectricMotorcycleForum.com
Makes And Models => Energica => Topic started by: jbtx on January 20, 2020, 10:44:40 AM
-
I love the beautiful design of the Esse Esse 9, and there is no question that the trim level is higher than zero sr/f or the hd LiveWire. On the topics of appearance, equipment, range, power, or charging speed, Energica wins. But the weight! It probably has so much extra of these things that it outweighs the competition by 100+ pounds to come in at 590-620lbs depending on old battery or new. Throughout the years I have ridden heavy motorcycles. And my large adventure bikes with high seats are my favorite for long distance road trips and off-road fun. This bike outweighs even those monsters.
I’m just very curious for those that transitioned into this motorcycle what the handling is like at slow speeds in the city, where I do most of my riding. I’ve never dropped a bike on the street before, and I am a cautious older rider. But I’m also not looking to push my luck.
I’m leaning towards a new zero SR/F purchase primarily based on the weight issue alone. Has anyone else struggled with this decision based on weight?
-
I love the beautiful design of the Esse Esse 9, and there is no question that the trim level is higher than zero sr/f or the hd LiveWire. On the topics of appearance, equipment, range, power, or charging speed, Energica wins. But the weight! It probably has so much extra of these things that it outweighs the competition by 100+ pounds to come in at 590-620lbs depending on old battery or new. Throughout the years I have ridden heavy motorcycles. And my large adventure bikes with high seats are my favorite for long distance road trips and off-road fun. This bike outweighs even those monsters.
I’m just very curious for those that transitioned into this motorcycle what the handling is like at slow speeds in the city, where I do most of my riding. I’ve never dropped a bike on the street before, and I am a cautious older rider. But I’m also not looking to push my luck.
I’m leaning towards a new zero SR/F purchase primarily based on the weight issue alone. Has anyone else struggled with this decision based on weight?
I have ridden my 2020 SS9 (the older heavier one) at very slow speeds with no issues, but I would prefer the light Zeros for such.
What does the SR/F weight? I don't remember how it compares in weight to the Energica. But the SR/F has no reverse or slow forward. The Energica does and that often helps a lot with very slow speed stuff, such as moving it around a few feet.
-Don- Auburn, CA
-
Don, the SR/F standard version is 485lbs
I’m encouraged to hear that you have not experienced awkward handling a slow speed’s. The available reviews all seem to quote the heavy weight that is reasonably high up as a factor in downtown urban riding with this bike.
-
Don, the SR/F standard version is 485lbs
I’m encouraged to hear that you have not experienced awkward handling a slow speed’s. The available reviews all seem to quote the heavy weight that is reasonably high up as a factor in downtown urban riding with this bike.
I am very used to heavier bikes, so I really don't notice. When I need to, I ride my 1,000 lb Harley around town with no issues.
Nevertheless, for around town stuff, I would say the lighter the better. But that doesn't mean you cannot do the same with a thousand lb bike. I have done such enough times with my Harley and they don't make many two wheel bikes heavier than it.
-Don- Auburn, CA
-
Weight factored in my decision to buy the SS9 but in its favor. I test rode the Zero SR, DSR, and SR/F Premium. The SR/F was the only Zero I liked on the freeway. Then I test rode the Energica SS9 and Eva107 and liked them even more on the freeway. Since my last 6 gas bikes were heavier bikes, the weight of the Energicas didn’t bother me at around town speeds. I was already used to riding heavy bikes at slow speeds. I commuted and toured on a Victory Cross Country Tour for a few years so compared to that beast everything else has felt very nimble, not that the Victory was bad, it wasn’t. It was just a physically big bike.
I like my SS9 so much that I sold my Triumph Trophy to make room for the Ribelle I have on order. In the end, it’s what you get used to. If you’re used to big heavy bikes, the weight of the Energicas probably won’t bother you. If you’re used to much lighter bikes then you probably won’t like the Energicas.
-
Thanks for feedback keep it coming. To answer the question, I guess I’m used to a heavy bike for long distance touring to absorb the road. And a more nimble lighter bike for downtown and urban riding. For me in the past, the electric use case has been the latter, not the former. So I’m just trying to rationalize the SS9 use case, Which seems more cafe racer /scrambler style. Not touring. I just love the look so much! I’m trying to talk myself into it LOL.
-
I can see the Energicas feeling ungainly in a pure urban environment. Since I’m in the Burbs, the SS9 works for me since I spend just as much time on the freeway as I do around town.
-
I have weighed my 2018 Zero S with a Power Tank and it weighs 452 pounds. Even that bike is very difficult for me to push around, especially backwards and uphill, as I need to do to get it parked in my garage. I don't think I could move a 630 pound Energica more than a couple of feet before I collapsed, being 75 and weighing 155 pounds. While I have never tried to push around an Energica, I do know that my Zero is a lot more difficult to move due to the drag of its direct-drive electric motor connection than most ICE motorcycles in neutral. I would say that my Zero adds about 100 pounds to its pushing effort. So that is my personal concern.
But I will admit that a heavier motorcycle typically rides smoother and is more stable on the highway, just not around shopping center parking lots - or two car garages. ;)
-
I have weighed my 2018 Zero S with a Power Tank and it weighs 452 pounds. Even that bike is very difficult for me to push around, especially backwards and uphill, as I need to do to get it parked in my garage. I don't think I could move a 630 pound Energica more than a couple of feet before I collapsed, being 75 and weighing 155 pounds. While I have never tried to push around an Energica, I do know that my Zero is a lot more difficult to move due to the drag of its direct-drive electric motor connection than most ICE motorcycles in neutral. I would say that my Zero adds about 100 pounds to its pushing effort. So that is my personal concern.
But I will admit that a heavier motorcycle typically rides smoother and is more stable on the highway, just not around shopping center parking lots - or two car garages. ;)
The Energicas have a slow mode (forward and backward) to maneuver it around in parking lots and such. This means you at least don't have to push, just make sure to not tip it over.
-
@jbtx :
I had a SV650 before buying my EVA, and don't regret it at all! :)
that's an heavy bike but all is pretty well balanced, this means it's not that hard to manipulate, and the slow Forward an Rear mode are helping a lot.
for cornering, that's like a big 1300 cc roadster
i never have been near from dropping the bike, even while sidelaning in city it handle well.
-
The Energicas have a slow mode (forward and backward) to maneuver it around in parking lots and such. This means you at least don't have to push, just make sure to not tip it over.
Here in Auburn my driveway is quite steep all the way to the garage door. I have much more difficulty backing my Zero SR in the garage than my SS9. The SS9 slow reverse makes it very easy. I wish all my bikes had that. Weight makes a big difference with such stuff, but the reverse and slow forward makes it even easier than a light bike.
BTW, I have never had my Harley at this house. It will be too difficult to deal with trying to get it in and out of the garage. It needs the reverse the most of all, but doesn't have such.
-Don- Auburn, CA
-
I’m approaching 50 and have never dropped a bike on the street. Off road, plenty :-) But I’ve also not rode a bike over 500 lbs in an urban/downtown daily setting. The SS9 weighs more than my Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sport - a bike I LOVE for touring and off-road. That just has me a bit spooked for downtown and urban setting.
Lots to consider thanks again for all the comments.
-
The Zero SDS 414 lb chassis is better balanced for trail braking, whereas the 620 lb SS9 was reviewed as standing up on trail braking, so you'd have to do your braking straight up, before corner entry. The massive, high bars on the SS9 were listed as needed to combat the understeer.
The new 20 kWh MotoE bikes apparently have the same problem and need to be 'steered with the rear.'
-
But I’ve also not rode a bike over 500 lbs in an urban/downtown daily setting. The SS9 weighs more than my Honda Africa Twin Adventure Sport.
Not saying the SS9 is light but it's not that much heavier than the Africa twin, you fill the tank up and your at ~560lbs on the Honda.
As for city riding when you are in motion you just don't give it a thought, 2020 bikes with 30 less lbs even less so.
Link to a good video about low speed handling of a 2019 SS9. For reference this was his first time ever riding a Energica. At the end of the day it's all training and mental confidence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4vJSzP5a3Y
-
As for city riding when you are in motion you just don't give it a thought, 2020 bikes with 30 less lbs even less so.
My older bike is the 2020 model, here in the USA. I purchased it in August of 2019. I think they will be calling the new bikes with the larger battery 2021 models here in the USA.
-Don- Auburn, CA
-
Low speed maneuvers are 90% the rider and only 10% the bike.
This video is pretty good evidence of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M9MVY8swO5M
A lot of it is committing to the turn and looking where you want to go (I've learned that lesson the hard way) and not being afraid to lean at low speeds.
A lot of not being afraid to lean at low speeds is throttle (accelerator) control.
Electric motors can easily provide much better accelerator control, but can still suffer from things like slack in the linkage and drivetrain.
Energica has really excellent linkage and a very predictable "throttle map" if I remember correctly from my 2 test rides a few year back.
Energica also has the low speed mode which amplifies the natural abilities of the electric motor to provide predictable control.
-
...Which really doesn't say that a heavy bike is a good idea if they take so much skill and muscle to operate.
-Crissa
-
I love my Ego's reverse feature, it makes parking in my garage backwards uphill possible regardless of the weight.
As for slow speed maneuvering, that's almost never dependent on the weight of the bike. You have to keep the center of gravity linear above the wheels. Get practicing on full lock turns, lean against the direction of the turn, and you'll find yourself turning around sharper than anything else on the road, even on a half-ton bike.
-
I agree with most of the recent postings. Maneuvering a heavy bike at slow speeds is much more about technique than muscle. In fact, if you're using muscles to maneuver a big/heavy bike at slow speeds you're doing it wrong.
-
...Which really doesn't say that a heavy bike is a good idea if they take so much skill and muscle to operate.
-Crissa
No bike takes muscle to operate at low speeds, just the proper technique. Riding technique requires no more than finger pressure, not muscle.
All bikes take the same amount of skill to operate at low speeds regardless of weight.
Where they differ is if you make a mistake - there are some situations you can muscle your way out of if the bike is light enough for your muscle mass. But, that only happens when the techniques fail you and their success is irrespective of weight.
They also differ in fear factor because the brain is very easily distracted by the "what if"s.
-
So, to repeat, you say it takes technique.
Technique is skill.
You say not having the technique is not compounded by the weight?
Uh-huh.
I'm bowing out after pointing out the absurdity of that position. If I make a mistake on my bike, yeah, it's heavy, but I can catch it. If I make the same mistake on a heavier bike, it's going to be a multiple worse to recover from that mistake.
-Crissa
-
Thanks for the endorsement course reminders ::)
I understand that with enough technique any weight is possible in tight urban settings.
But I think you really have to love the look and build spec of the energica to ride a 600lb naked style in that setting. I landed on the zero sr/f standard and put in my order yesterday.
If energica ever makes a bike in the 400s with a bit less power and range, smaller lighter battery configuration I’d spend a lot of money on it.
I genuinely was on the fence when I posted, thanks again for the insights
-
So, to repeat, you say it takes technique.
Technique is skill.
You say not having the technique is not compounded by the weight?
Uh-huh.
I'm bowing out after pointing out the absurdity of that position. If I make a mistake on my bike, yeah, it's heavy, but I can catch it. If I make the same mistake on a heavier bike, it's going to be a multiple worse to recover from that mistake.
-Crissa
Most riders haven't learned proper low speed techniques.
The mistakes those riders make can be "managed" by muscling through if the bike is light enough. I think we are in agreement there and I said so above.
But, "managing by muscling through" is going to fail any rider eventually so learning proper low speed techniques is an important skill to learn (though neglected by 95+% of riders).
Proper low speed maneuvering doesn't require lots of muscle or talent. It might seem so because riding on the street doesn't teach these techniques at all and so someone who is really good on the street but still has to wobble through a parking lot might think that it requires high talent. No, it requires some focused learning.
I don't know if the beginner rider courses teach much of this, but I do remember spending some time learning these skills in parking lots when I took some post-license-level safety classes. They teach the technique pretty well, but you do need some additional practice on your own to really dial them in. And it's something most riders can manage. (And it requires periodic practice as well.)
Once you learn this skill that will help you with lighter bikes, heavier bikes aren't any additional burden. That's what I was getting at.
But, if you don't learn and get good at these skills, then you will need more muscle to correct your wobbles with heavier bikes.
-
But, if you don't learn and get good at these skills, then you will need more muscle to correct your wobbles with heavier bikes.
Yep, but in time, is should come naturally simply by riding heavy bikes and getting used to them, as I have.
-Don- Auburn, CA
-
Thanks for the endorsement course reminders ::)
I understand that with enough technique any weight is possible in tight urban settings.
But I think you really have to love the look and build spec of the energica to ride a 600lb naked style in that setting. I landed on the zero sr/f standard and put in my order yesterday.
If energica ever makes a bike in the 400s with a bit less power and range, smaller lighter battery configuration I’d spend a lot of money on it.
I genuinely was on the fence when I posted, thanks again for the insights
Glad you found the right bike for you! I think you’ll have a lot of happy miles on the SR/F. It’s a great machine!
-
Thanks for the endorsement course reminders ::)
I understand that with enough technique any weight is possible in tight urban settings.
But I think you really have to love the look and build spec of the energica to ride a 600lb naked style in that setting. I landed on the zero sr/f standard and put in my order yesterday.
If energica ever makes a bike in the 400s with a bit less power and range, smaller lighter battery configuration I’d spend a lot of money on it.
I genuinely was on the fence when I posted, thanks again for the insights
Have you tried out the smaller Zeros? You can get all you're asking for with the less range, lighter battery and less power-- and will cost much less than the SR/F.
-Don- Auburn, CA
-
He posted on the Zero thread he's owned smaller Zeros already. He going for the gusto.
-
But, if you don't learn and get good at these skills, then you will need more muscle to correct your wobbles with heavier bikes.
Yep, but in time, is should come naturally simply by riding heavy bikes and getting used to them, as I have.
-Don- Auburn, CA
I apologize for straying too far off topic here, but I'd just like to point out that street riding does not teach the skills that are specific to low speed riding. In particular, some of the skills you perform at low speeds that are necessary for stability at low speeds would lead to an accident at road speeds. It really is a different set of skills and there are plenty of articles out there that go over them.
That's the last I'll say on this particular topic. The information is out there for those who wish to learn.