ElectricMotorcycleForum.com
Makes And Models => Energica => Topic started by: Dryer667 on August 14, 2022, 10:55:44 PM
-
I just put down a deposit on a Esseesse9+ RS so kicking off the delivery countdown (I have been told Dec/Jan). We will see.
In the meantime, what have folks noticed about the impacts of gearing change on both range and speedo accuracy? I went for the RS just because but am wondering about the impacts of the drop in front sprocket teeth. I have been riding for 20 years and changed gearing many times on IC bikes but Id love to learn more about how gearing changes impact efficiency on a EV.
-
Congrats on pulling the trigger on a EsseEsse9!
Regarding final drive ratios. Electric motors have a wider RPM range (compared to ICE) where they are most efficient, small changes to the gearing ratio will not have a massive impact on range. The motor is only spinning a few hundred RPM more with a 15 tooth front sprocket (RS) vs the standard bikes 16 tooth. However the acceleration difference is quite noticeable on the RS models. I can confirm that large changes to the gearing ratio will result in a noticeable change in range. I swapped the stock 16/44 sprockets on a 13.4kWh EGO to 15/50. Motor speed at 70mph increased by around 2,000 RPM which would equate to ~100mph with stock gearing. Range dropped by about 20%.
There are changes in software to account for the gearing adjustment of the RS bike. Please note that changing the gear ratio to something other than stock will result in an inaccurate calculation of the bikes speed.
-
Thanks for the info and congrats; its very helpful!
-
Please note that changing the gear ratio to something other than stock will result in an inaccurate calculation of the bikes speed.
Any updates on firmware fixes to address the stock bikes' already inaccurate speedometer? I and others here have already confirmed the speedometer is 10% high at freeway speeds. It's the only reason I use a GPS on my bike...to know how fast I'm really cruising down the freeway.
-
I am another GPS user because the speedometer is so inaccurate. It's nice to look down and see your speed without calculating the 10% error in the bike's speedometer. Energica claims the top speed on the Ribelle is 125 MPH but it is only 112 MPH once you factor in the 10% error. But there should be a gearing change that will make the speedometer more accurate. Smaller sprocket in back with stock front?
-
Energica claims the top speed on the Ribelle is 125 MPH but it is only 112 MPH once you factor in the 10% error.
I didn't even think about this aspect of the speedometer being so far off on the stock bikes. Makes me sad we're not getting the advertised top speed due to this. :(
-
I've been thinking of going from a 15 tooth to a 16 tooth front on my Ribelle RS.
Since the speedo reading is coming from the motor, a larger front sprocket would mean the motor is spinning slower to get the same speed, In my head that might equate to a closer reading. Maybe not 10%, but perhaps closer?
Someone yell at me if I've got that backwards.
-
Do these bikes have a tach?
-
Yes, it is digital.
-
I am another GPS user because the speedometer is so inaccurate. It's nice to look down and see your speed without calculating the 10% error in the bike's speedometer. Energica claims the top speed on the Ribelle is 125 MPH but it is only 112 MPH once you factor in the 10% error. But there should be a gearing change that will make the speedometer more accurate. Smaller sprocket in back with stock front?
If they claim the bike can go 125 MPH, it should mean the speedometer will then read 137.5 mph when you're really going 125.0 MPH.
I think all European motorcycles read quite high. Unlike Zero and HD and American made bikes.
Perhaps because of the speed cameras in Europe that they don't use here in the USA. They are trying to do you a favor, IMO, but they overdo it. While I would prefer accuracy, it's not a big deal to me. But I do have a GPS in every bike I own. Very important with electric bikes, IMO. I set my GPS for "shortest route" and "freeway okay" on my electrics. And I have a separate directory for "CCS charge" and "J-charge" that I keep updated from Plugshare.
-Don- Reno, NV
-
The speedometer tops out at 125, doesn't go any higher than that so yes, max speed is really just 112 MPH per GPS.
-
The 10 % appear constant through at least the speed range of 20 - 130 kph (GPS and radar tested), so there's a factor of 1.1 somewhere inside the software.
Please also refer to Hans' Blog, where he adresses this: https://fotoleer.wordpress.com/2022/05/11/these-are-3-ble-values-that-energica-doesnt-want-you-to-see/
Interestingly, this +10 % is the maximum deviation allowed for speedometers by the EU law (EU regulation R39; a negative deviation is forbidden). Energica seems to play it very safe.
To my knowledge, the speed is not calculated by the motor revolutions but from a sensor on the front wheel. Might be the same one that is used for the ABS.
BTW: This sensor is also used for the kilometer gauge which according to German law (§57 No.3 StVZO), which must be the same as in all EU, has to have a relatively high accuracy (max. +/- 4 %).
So, changing the gear ratio should not change the speed reading. Changing front tyre dimensions would.
-
I am another GPS user because the speedometer is so inaccurate. It's nice to look down and see your speed without calculating the 10% error in the bike's speedometer. Energica claims the top speed on the Ribelle is 125 MPH but it is only 112 MPH once you factor in the 10% error. But there should be a gearing change that will make the speedometer more accurate. Smaller sprocket in back with stock front?
If they claim the bike can go 125 MPH, it should mean the speedometer will then read 137.5 mph when you're really going 125.0 MPH.
I think all European motorcycles read quite high. Unlike Zero and HD and American made bikes.
Perhaps because of the speed cameras in Europe that they don't use here in the USA. They are trying to do you a favor, IMO, but they overdo it. While I would prefer accuracy, it's not a big deal to me. But I do have a GPS in every bike I own. Very important with electric bikes, IMO. I set my GPS for "shortest route" and "freeway okay" on my electrics. And I have a separate directory for "CCS charge" and "J-charge" that I keep updated from Plugshare.
Having owned a number of BMW motorcycles, I had the same impression about European speedometer accuracy as you, Don. However, I was surprised to see that my 2020 KTM Duke 390's speedometer reads just 1 mph fast at all speeds. Perhaps being manufactured in India makes a difference. ??? My 2018 Zero also reads 1 mph fast, BTW. Of course, ticket-dispensing speed cameras in the U.S. are extremely rare. What we see here are speed-check cameras that you can use to verify your top speed - providing that you are not exceeding their 99 mph two-digit capacity. ;)
-
To my knowledge, the speed is not calculated by the motor revolutions but from a sensor on the front wheel. Might be the same one that is used for the ABS.
BTW: This sensor is also used for the kilometer gauge which according to German law (§57 No.3 StVZO), which must be the same as in all EU, has to have a relatively high accuracy (max. +/- 4 %).
So, changing the gear ratio should not change the speed reading. Changing front tyre dimensions would.
Sorry to prove you wrong, this speed thing enoys me from the start, the only reason why I bought the Energica was the promissed topspeed from 200km/u in real live and not
some figuires in the dash. I don't care how much the tacho indicates too much 10, 20, even 30% :) as long as the actual promised top speed could be achieved.
I swapped the rear sprocket to 41 and 42 tooth for testing, it make a change in the topspeed, a 41 let the Ribelle do real +200km/u on gps so nothing to do with sensors in the
front wheel.
-
MoneyFor,
When you went to a 41 tooth rear sprocket how noticeable was the decrease in acceleration?
-
Not really, the bike has more than enough torque that you can hardly apply anywhere during a "normal" ride. But keep in mind that I only use the Energica
as a toy and always want to get the top speed out, I notice the difference in acceleration but the gain in top speed is worth more to me.
-
I’m about to have a 41T put on the rear as well but for the opposite reason as MoneyFor (nothing): eeking out a few extra miles of range and correcting the speedo. I’ll report back in a few weeks.
-
I’m about to have a 41T put on the rear as well but for the opposite reason as MoneyFor (nothing): eeking out a few extra miles of range and correcting the speedo. I’ll report back in a few weeks.
Keep us posted. Thinking of doing the same eventually. Would be nice to have the speedo read closer to actual. If the only side effect is a bit better range, even better!
-
I’m about to have a 41T put on the rear as well but for the opposite reason as MoneyFor (nothing): eeking out a few extra miles of range and correcting the speedo. I’ll report back in a few weeks.
Why do you think there will be extra miles :-\ the bike still has the same air- resistance when driving, that is the main force that the motor must overcome. That does not change. The electromotor does not really care if that is with a slightly lower rpm.
I think it is wishful thinking that the rance will improve.
-
Lower motor RPM’s, perhaps closer to the motor’s most efficient point on the RPM range. The only report I’ve seen from someone who’s actually done it said he gets up to 10% extra range in warm weather. Most people have said it won’t matter, but none of them were speaking from experience. I’m skeptical of the 10% figure, as that seems high to me, but I’ll know if there’s a difference. The Wh/mi from Davis to San Francisco is pretty consistent except on days with high wind, so I can say it helped if I make it to the charging stop in Richmond with more than 10% SoC.
-
Dumb question for how invested I am at this point… what bolt pattern is the Ribelle for the rear sprocket? Nothing seems to match up
-
Dumb question for how invested I am at this point… what bolt pattern is the Ribelle for the rear sprocket? Nothing seems to match up
Standard racing 5 bolt pattern. Uses the same as Marchesini wheels.
-
Thank you!
-
Lower motor RPM’s, perhaps closer to the motor’s most efficient point on the RPM range. .
I don't think this is an thing with an E-motor. Torgue is constant from 0 rpm.
But I am curious at the outcome of you test.
-
It's not about torque, it's about the motor's efficiency curve, which peaks at a certain RPM and then falls off. Energica has engineered these bikes to be about having fun in the twisties as the first priority, so it's possible that the Interstate cruising RPM is beyond the motor's efficient range and that the gearing change would bring it closer.
-
It's not about torque, it's about the motor's efficiency curve, which peaks at a certain RPM and then falls off. Energica has engineered these bikes to be about having fun in the twisties as the first priority, so it's possible that the Interstate cruising RPM is beyond the motor's efficient range and that the gearing change would bring it closer.
I'll find out here in a couple days! Will go out on a known distance loop involving highways, in urban mode, perhaps 50-60 miles using my current gearing, change sprockets out then repeat, charging between and writing down batt% and average mileage estimates. I know its not perfect, but if I make an honest effort to drive similarly, perhaps we'll get at least one data point.
-
No range improvement expected because power required is the same for same motoring conditions.
Regen will have biggest range impact so suggest (4) runs total w/ RegenLow and RegenHigh adders perhaps?
Note, not suggesting no-regen because that isn't safe but it's the better control condition for the comparative being made...anyway, paying attention to the speedo correction experiment...good stuff.
-
No range improvement expected because power required is the same for same motoring conditions.
Regen will have biggest range impact so suggest (4) runs total w/ RegenLow and RegenHigh adders perhaps?
Note, not suggesting no-regen because that isn't safe but it's the better control condition for the comparative being made...anyway, paying attention to the speedo correction experiment...good stuff.
What do you mean no Regen isn't safe? I haven't run regen since I first got the bike. Being able to coast is wonderful, and in certain conditions can actually give you more range than using regen. All of my testing will be ran without it since that simulates my normal driving condition.
-
Interesting to read that Energica uses the speedometer reading to limit the top speed. One of the reasons I was considering the Energica over others was the top speed advantage. The speedo error would tend to negate its advantage on anything other than the Ego.
-
What do you mean no Regen isn't safe? I haven't run regen since I first got the bike. Being able to coast is wonderful, and in certain conditions can actually give you more range than using regen. All of my testing will be ran without it since that simulates my normal driving condition.
Okay, riding styles differ, sorry about that - sounds like you like the free wheel effect - heavy dependence on regen here when one rides like they stole it and that's why the impact to range was mentioned. Never mind, carry on...
-
heavy dependence on regen here when one rides like they stole it
@PWM: I really love that expression :D