The riding position was the number one reason followed by the pure Italian sexiness of the bike although that was offset by the SR/F's lower routine maintenance requirements and better range. So...really just the riding position.
The more maintenance means nothing to me as long as I can do it myself. The riding position is important. That is what I didn't like abut the SR/F along with the foot pegs being up way too high for me.
BTW, this morning in Reno, I rode my buddy's shinny new 2019 BMW RT1250 for a few miles. What a nice bike! Fit me perfect! But I have more than enough ICE bikes, besides the fact I am done buying anything ICE for life.
He rode my BMW, the 1971. He was very surprised how well my old bike ran. He really likes its ride also. Runs better than new because of some performance mods I made over the years.
BTW, ever ride the plain SR? You will this Saturday! MUCH more comfy than the SR/F, at least to me. But the seat is rather hard.
Today from Reno, I hit some slow traffic which means I get here a lot faster! At least I would have. I was not going to recharge all the way here because I had exactly 50% of my charge left when I got to the Gold Run Rest Stop (near Exit 143 on I-80). I needed a break because of the hard seat! But the west bond Gold Run Rest Stop is closed today. So I did the next best thing. I rode to the Colfax train station where they have a bench in the shade, as I recharge back up for free. By the time I was done checking my email and looked at my messages in this forum (including the one that I am replying to right now), I was charged up to 90% and my range said (based on the way I have been riding) is 212 miles. It probably would have said above 250 miles if I charged to full. This is the most range I have ever seen indicated on this bike. But the warm weather and slow traffic made a big improvement in range. And from the summit, it's mostly down hill.
-Don- Auburn, CA