No, I actually didn't have to adjust it much at all. What I was trying to imply is that the belt was always maintained according to specs and best practices. Belt kept about 1mm from outside edge/lip of rear sprocket (so not quite centered) and tensioned using the Gates tension gauge per unofficial manual. I always kept the belt at the lower end of the tension spec.
No reason that I can think of why the belt should have failed this soon. I'm thinking that either the belt was defective or it was mishandled prior to being installed at the factory. I've read that these carbon reinforced belts need to be handled with care.
Geez, tough crowd.
Oh, not a tough crowd at all. (Well, except for one guy who knows who he is...and whose advice I took...I got out).
These belts should be the least of your potential worries considering all the issues some of us have had with the electronics. I agree about lubrication. Dry lube or not, one doesn’t lube a belt.
Everyone here usually wants to help if they bother to post at all.
I sold my ‘15 SR due to ongoing electronics issues unresolved after the first “firmware†update over a year prior. I never even looked at the belt in 12,000 miles.
Remember “Elegant Simplicity†is the baseline notion with these things. For the most part that means, ride it and don’t worry about it until it quits.[emoji846]
Edited: just occurred to me...when did the wider belt come out? These failures seem to be 2016+. My 2015 was the narrow one. Are the bigger belts proving to be failure prone? Certainly was not the intent.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk