> > Doug, continuous loads are supposed to limit themselves to 80% of rated. So you should draw no more than 24 continuous amps from your 30A circuit.
> Who says we're "supposed to"? It may be recommended design practice in some disciplines, but I'm pretty sure a "30A" breaker or outlet is rated for continuous use -- if they weren't, they'd be called 24A outlets. I'm not aware of any derating requirements in the NEC or anywhere else.
https://blog.schneider-electric.com/datacenter/power-and-cooling/2014/06/12/clearing-confusion-80-vs-100-rated-circuit-breakers/> > And a constant-power charger will draw more amps when voltage drops (like in brownout conditions).
> Yes, but the opposite argument is that a "6kW" charger doesn't actually supply 6kW for very long, anyhow.
Really? My diginows provide pretty constant current unless they measure too much heat. Each one gives me almost 3.5kw if I give it 240VAC all the way up to 116.5v on the battery.
> Further, that's why everything has +- tolerances, to allow for local and temporary variances/overloads. Even if you do have a brownout, and your charger doesn't behave well (by dropping the charge current or dropping out altogether), everything can withstand the load. If there's ever a danger of anything overheating dangerously, the fuse or the breaker will protect the wiring, the outlet and the equipment. That's what fuses and breakers are FOR.
Circuit breakers trip at higher than design load. Doesn't mean it's fine to run hard till the breaker trips.
> ... and anyhow, I wasn't talking about capacities or wiring. I'm just saying a "charge station" is no better than an outlet. DynoMutt may have a couple of minor points with durability and lockability (though I'd argue with him about the J1772 having recessed leads that are safer -- if a 14-30 plug/outlet was "unsafe", it would be pulled from the market), but for occasional home use, I just can't justify the extra expense.
Well, if you pull a NEMA plug from the wall 1/4" inch, there'll be powered contacts that small fingers could touch, and even at 1/8" a metal utensil in curious hands could touch, so, yeah, J1772 is safer. But enough safer to justify the higher cost? Well, depends on your situation. A lockable cover is cheaper.