The problem is, people will still complain about the range and charge time. The lightning solves both of those problems..for the most part. DC isn't perfect, but it is better than banking on the 12Kw. Making the SR/F with the Lightning Carbons battery, lvl 3 charging and selling it closer to 16-17k would probably have a lot of ICE bike riders consider buying it.
Or better yet, Tesla should just buy Zero and rebadge them. That would boost sales and give us access to all the tesla charging infrastructure.
DC would be the way to go if it were more common. That means 100% of the charger is on the street, not in your bike. Bike would be lighter with no on-board charger and no charging accessories needed, other than perhaps a high current DC charger at home.
But before you go for the DC charging, be sure you know where you can charge.
Elon Musk has already said that Tesla will NOT get into the motorcycle business. I heard he was almost killed on a motorcycle and doesn't really care much for them from then on.
But for now, the J1772 AC outlets are perhaps the most common--and often free to use, especially here in the Reno area, but that means the charger must be in the vehicle (or carried).
But I don't find it to be a big deal, in most cases. The slower AC charging just means better planning is necessary. And I kinda enjoy the forced breaks to charge, in many cases.
If I am going on a real long trip to the middle of nowhere, I will not consider any E-motocycle. At least not in my lifetime. Maybe someday they will have a very common DC standard for all EVs, which will make them much more popular.
Perhaps the sales of the SR/F will make Zero a larger company--and then be able to buy out Lightning and be even larger!
-Don- Reno, NV