The nominal capacity is 9Kw...but this is what Zero declares based on manufacturer std. features.
If EIG did the homework in the manufacturing process you should have a little more available capacity but remember that using total capacity means reducing charging cycles...
Guys, no prob i'm famillar with battery engineering , i have my test lab since 2006, but thanks for sharing your info anyway. I know that using 100% SOC will reduce cycle life. Unfortunatly not all cells are like the A123 wich are not very affected by 100% DOD
In fact Zero specify their battery energy in two different way:
-full charged Voltage x Ah = the way to get the rebate from different program of EV sales. ex: the stock 2011 is 3.9kWh nominal but is specifed as 4.3kWh to get the rebate that start with 4.0kWh battery...
- Nominal voltage x Ah = The right way that give the true energy of the battery.
btw the nominal voltage have been defined as the voltage that a battery have 50% SOC in Wh not AH and when measured while dishcarged at 1C if i remember correctly.
I recall that half the Ah does not mean half the energy of the battery because the voltage is higher at the begining of teh discharge so the first 50% SOS have more Wh than the last 50% SOC
so when calculating your trip and max range, dont use the Ah, , use the Wh!.. otherwise the last Ah will be at low voltage and to get the same power on the motor you will need to crank a bit more amp to compensate the lower voltage at the end of discharge
Doc