ElectricMotorcycleForum.com

  • November 25, 2024, 02:05:25 PM
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Electric Motorcycle Forum is live!

Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner  (Read 2410 times)

kcoplan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
    • View Profile
Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« on: September 15, 2012, 02:17:40 AM »

Putting miles on my 2012 Zero S . . . Slowly.

Two questions for more experienced owners -

1) how accurate is the speedometer at highway speeds?  Although the speed flasher in the MacBook zone seems to confirm the 22 mph reading on my speedometer,  75 mph on the speedometer on the highway does not feel like a true 75 mph given the traffic passing me.  Anyone confirm the speed calibration?

2) how accurate is the battery bar indicator?  Can I count on six bars really being just as much range left as I have already used up.  I want to test the limits of how far I can ride, without having to push the bike home.  If I ride out for six bars, can I count on riding back without boinking the battery pack (assuming that I am not doing more speed or climbing on the way back)?  So far, I have dared to ride out 5 bars worth on the parkway and return on back roads, leaving 4 bars remaining, so I am sure I can go a little farther . . .

Thanks in advance for advice.

- Karl
Logged

protomech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1996
    • View Profile
    • ProtoBlog
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2012, 05:14:45 AM »

My speedometer reads about 4% high. YMMV.

Harlan posted instructions for recalibrating the speedometer here, though I have not yet tried them.

There are 11 visible bars on the "fuel" gauge. The first bar often seems like it has 2/3 the energy of the other bars (probably due to the charge terminating around 97-99% SOC); otherwise the bars feel very linear, probably within 10% of each other.

When the final bar disappears, the battery is at approximately 15% SOC. If discharged to 0% 0% SOC then it effectively has an extra 1.5 - 2.0 invisible capacity bars. I view these as an emergency reserve and try to avoid regularly tapping into it; the battery pack will probably live longer if it is not fully discharged, and as it ages the battery may increasingly hit its lower-voltage cutoff well before 0% SOC.

You will probably be well-served to determine the margin of error on both of these parameters for yourself; eg measure a route via GPS then compare to bike odometer, and record miles at a certain speed for each bar, then do a loop near to home until the battery cuts out. Or as near as you care to take it.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2012, 05:16:26 AM by protomech »
Logged
1999 Honda VFR800i | 2014 Zero SR
Check out who's near you on frodus's EV owner map!
http://protomech.wordpress.com/

Doctorbass

  • Battery tech
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 971
    • View Profile
    • Endless-sphere.com
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2012, 10:17:40 AM »

My speedometer reads about 4% high. YMMV.

Harlan posted instructions for recalibrating the speedometer here, though I have not yet tried them.

There are 11 visible bars on the "fuel" gauge. The first bar often seems like it has 2/3 the energy of the other bars (probably due to the charge terminating around 97-99% SOC); otherwise the bars feel very linear, probably within 10% of each other.

When the final bar disappears, the battery is at approximately 15% SOC. If discharged to 0% 0% SOC then it effectively has an extra 1.5 - 2.0 invisible capacity bars. I view these as an emergency reserve and try to avoid regularly tapping into it; the battery pack will probably live longer if it is not fully discharged, and as it ages the battery may increasingly hit its lower-voltage cutoff well before 0% SOC.

You will probably be well-served to determine the margin of error on both of these parameters for yourself; eg measure a route via GPS then compare to bike odometer, and record miles at a certain speed for each bar, then do a loop near to home until the battery cuts out. Or as near as you care to take it.

As for the speedo calibration, do you know if there is a way to recalibrate the "fuel" gauge bar?.. I replaced my BMS on my DS 2011 with a nre upgraded from zero but the fuel gauge is off calibration ... the last bar dissapear and i still have 35Ah in the battery ( on that 70 ah full pack).. I installed a cycle analyst device that count the Ah with a shunt...)

any help to the fuel  gauge  recalibrated? or is it software?.. if so what is the way to reprogram it with the OBDII port with the Can/Bus...

Thanks!

Doc
Logged
Zero Drag racing bike: 12.2s 1/4 mile and 7.3s 1/8 mile

T w i t t e r  :     http://twitter.com/DocbassMelancon

kcoplan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 137
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2012, 11:06:35 PM »

Thanks for all the advice - went on a 45 mile ride today and got home with two bars flashing at me.  Not as interested in miles, per se, as with "where can I go for a ride and still get home to charge?". Miles will vary depending on highway versus back roads and hills versus flats.

The good news is now I know I can ride from my house up to Harriman State park via back roads, ride some of the park roads up there, come back on the Palisades Parkway, and still have two bars to spare.  That's all I really need to know, for now!

- Karl
Logged

iJustride

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #4 on: October 09, 2012, 12:12:45 AM »

My speedometer reads about 4% high. YMMV.

Harlan posted instructions for recalibrating the speedometer here, though I have not yet tried them.

Anyone know the input value needed to provide an accurate speedo reading on a stock bike? Mine is also around 4% high.
Logged

ColoPaul

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #5 on: October 09, 2012, 01:38:59 AM »

Hi and Welcome IJustride

My stock speedo value was "832";  I was also seeing about 4% high like protomech.
To adjust, I took 832 * 0.96 = 798;  I entered "798" and now it's pretty close.

Logged
2012 S ZF6    03 BMW K1200GT

iJustride

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #6 on: October 09, 2012, 01:56:09 AM »

Hi and Welcome IJustride

My stock speedo value was "832";  I was also seeing about 4% high like protomech.
To adjust, I took 832 * 0.96 = 798;  I entered "798" and now it's pretty close.


Thank you!
Makes sense now, at first glance I thought the math was more complicated than that.
Logged

paul

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #7 on: October 09, 2012, 06:25:30 PM »

The battery SOC estimation (aka "fuel gauge") should improve slightly over the first few packs you burn through as the BMS self-calibrates itself.
Logged

NoiseBoy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 819
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #8 on: October 09, 2012, 06:54:01 PM »

Its worth mentioning that the speedo has to read high by law (at least in Europe) to prevent drivers from blaming the vehicle for speeding fines.  4% is actually pretty accurate as most cars are nearer 10% over.  Probably an idea to have it reading a little high so you aren't playing chicken with the radar guns.
Logged

paul

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #9 on: October 09, 2012, 08:08:57 PM »

All precision measurements have a margin of uncertainty that is unavoidable in reality.  Especially in a high volume scenario like a motorcycle production line, it's unreasonable to expect each and every speedometer to be calibrated within anything better than, say, 5-10% of its true value (value is guesstimate - I don't know actual tolerance offhand).

It's not that law requires it to read high - it's that reading the speed too high is not as bad as reading it too low in the eyes of various regulatory bodies...
Logged

protomech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1996
    • View Profile
    • ProtoBlog
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #10 on: October 09, 2012, 08:43:12 PM »

I'm glad that the LVC precision sensor is not 5% too low (risking battery safety) or 5% high (slightly reducing range). Or that the charger's voltage sensor is not set 5% too high (risking battery safety on charge termination) or 5% too low (slightly reducing range).
Logged
1999 Honda VFR800i | 2014 Zero SR
Check out who's near you on frodus's EV owner map!
http://protomech.wordpress.com/

Doctorbass

  • Battery tech
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 971
    • View Profile
    • Endless-sphere.com
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #11 on: October 10, 2012, 10:09:46 AM »

I'm glad that the LVC precision sensor is not 5% too low (risking battery safety) or 5% high (slightly reducing range). Or that the charger's voltage sensor is not set 5% too high (risking battery safety on charge termination) or 5% too low (slightly reducing range).
Yeah it seem pretty accurate.. I have measure dthat the LVC of my zero 2011 is at 3.00V parallel group. wich is the recommanded for lithium ( non phosphate) cells.. but the molicells are 2.5V if i remember correctly.. but i guess keeping these 500mV higher LVC reduce the risk of unbalance the pack sicn ethe RI variation is more affected on both end of the cahrge discharge curve.

Doc
Logged
Zero Drag racing bike: 12.2s 1/4 mile and 7.3s 1/8 mile

T w i t t e r  :     http://twitter.com/DocbassMelancon

ColoPaul

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #12 on: October 10, 2012, 06:50:21 PM »

All precision measurements have a margin of uncertainty that is unavoidable in reality.  Especially in a high volume scenario like a motorcycle production line, it's unreasonable to expect each and every speedometer to be calibrated within anything better than, say, 5-10% of its true value (value is guesstimate - I don't know actual tolerance offhand).

I would bet $10 that Zero intentionally sets the speedo's 5%+/-1% high.  Range is key for an emoto; what cheaper easier way to get 5% more range?  Also the side effect of making the bike 'feel' a little faster.
Logged
2012 S ZF6    03 BMW K1200GT

Richard230

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9670
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #13 on: October 10, 2012, 08:45:55 PM »

While my speedometer also reads about 4% high (I have a couple of BMWs that read 8% fast), I think the bike's odometer is pretty accurate as it seems to agree with the odometer of my car when traveling over the identical route.
Logged
Richard's motorcycle collection:  2018 16.6 kWh Zero S, 2020 KTM 390 Duke, 2002 Yamaha FZ1 (FZS1000N) and a 1978 Honda Kick 'N Go Senior.

amahoser

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 62
    • View Profile
Re: Two Caibration Questions from a New Owner
« Reply #14 on: October 10, 2012, 10:53:11 PM »


 
I would bet $10 that Zero intentionally sets the speedo's 5%+/-1% high.  Range is key for an emoto; what cheaper easier way to get 5% more range?  Also th
e side effect of making the bike 'feel' a little faster.
 

I'll take that bet. You are correct that Zero intentionally set the Speedo high. But the reason isn't a conspiracy. It is federally mandated that a manufacturer cannot have a speedometer that displays a speed lower than actual. Higher than actual is perfectly acceptable but lower is illegal. So most manufacturers set a Speedo 5 to 10% higher for a safety margin. Most gas cars and  motorcycles display higher than actual.

Jose Soriano
Logged
Pages: [1] 2