Then I don't know why you'd chastise me for mentioning the limitation with AC only vehicles like the Zero. It's about clarity. I'm an EVangelist and constantly find that most people are confused on this (and the entirety of charging "standards").
Also in case anyone isn't aware. A CCS is a J-1772 plus DC pins. So if you have a Tesla to CCS adapter, you can use a Tesla destination charger if your vehicle supports AC charging. The DC pins are ignored.
The entire thing is confusing if you're not into EVs or knowledgeable about electricity.
Where did you feel I did such?
And FWIW, I have been into electronics my entire life, both as hobby and profession. And BTW, CCS is a lot more complicated than just DC on those extra thick pins. It runs a program that causes all types of compatibility issues with some vehicles and takes a lot of things into consideration, such as make of vehicle, battery temperaure, charge rate, etc.
Have you ever used CCS? It sounds like you have not. The first thing that happens is the initiation process for about 15 seconds before the charging even starts. With the old CCS Chargepoint FW in the CCS chargers, the initiation process would not end, so the charging would never start with Energicas. Later, when l Chagepoint updated their FW, they now work the best off all. On other makes of CCS chargers, I have had them work fine on my Energica when the car after me would not charge at all.
CCS has been unreliable at best. The problem is that it needs to work on too many different types of EVs and there will probably always be the one that will not work with one charger make that will work on another. Or FW version.
I assume everybody in this forum who has used CCS has had at least some problems using it.
-Don- Auburn, CA