Today, I took a 300-mile ride on my Energica Experia. I first went to Lake Lahontan, NV and from there to Bridgeport, CA to have my favorite
Baja Fish Tacos at the Burger Barn.
While having my late lunch, I
charged up here. Battery was warm (in the yellow at the start of the charge), and only charged at around 15 to 16 KW on my Experia.
I was thinking if I had the Zero DSR/X there, with the extra charger, I could charge it at 13.2 KW at a couple of different places for free that are just a couple of blocks away. So then no big difference in charging speed between the Experia and the DSR/X.
Not a big deal, but it cost me more than five bucks for the CCS charge. I would not notice the difference if I was charging at 13.2KW which can be done on the
80-amp AC charge station here, a block away from where I was using the CCS. And free to use.
The bike prices do compare. Add the extra AC charger to the Zero DSR/X for 3K$ & several hundred more to install at the dealer, add the bags and travel trunk, you now added around 7K$ to the price of the DSR/X to match the charging and bags of the Experia. But AC charging is MUCH more reliable than CCS and there are more of them. So that is also something to consider.
Now here is a small thing, that is also usually NBD, but I like better on the DSR/X. On the DSR/X, the Eco mode is very useful, and is good for 75 mph on the freeway and even has reasonable acceleration. I have done entire trips in the eco mode on the DSR/X.
I would never do that on the Experia.
The Experica in the Eco mode is dangerous to use, IMO. It will only go 53 MPH max (as shown on my GPS) , very weak acceleration. Get on the freeway with it (say you forget to select a better mode) and then to select a faster mode, you have to figure out the menu, release the throttle to get it to change. This can be very dangerous when a car is already on your tail.
I realize this is usually NBD, but I find the menus easier to use on the DSR/X than the Experia. And I find the menus on my SS9 to be easier to use than the Experia as well.
And the DSR/X has no bugs. The Experia has several. Mostly the false or very delayed messages on the screen.
I assume the Experia is much faster than the Zero DSR/X in the sport mode. I still have not had either of the bikes in the sport mode and I am not going to try to compare that. I assume either would be scary fast, at least to me.
The very short range of the widescreen on the Experia is so small, you will notice no difference at all when all the way up or all the way down. No need to waste your time to adjust it. There is some noticeable difference with the DSR/X windscreen. Still not a big difference, but probably don't want much more than that on an electric bike to reduce the range when fully up anyway.
I still enjoy both bikes a lot, but I think I am finding more things I like better with the DSR/X. But the extra range of the Experia is a biggie.
I have decided to not buy the extra DSR/X charger, as I like the extra room for storage on the bike and I am at countless charge stations that cannot even do the full 6.6 KW as it is. But Bridgeport should be good for a lot more than the 13.2 KW AC charge.
So still, I would make the decision between the two bikes based on charging and range.
The Experia has better range for sure, and that is also something to consider. The Experia is good for at least fifty more miles than the DSR/X even when charged up to 110%.
I used that 2nd screen today on the Experia. All the info is way too small. Difficult to read at a fast glance, but very good info is there if you can read it before you crash into something.
The info. on the screen of the DSR/X is much larger and easier to read, but there is not nearly as much info. Not even the trip odometers (two of them) can be shown on the screen of the DSR/X, but is on the main Experia screen.
-Don- Reno, NV