Not impressed.
-- A sportbike-like tuck on a completely naked bike that has zero wind protection.
What's the point? On sportbikes, while the tuck may be uncomfortable, you gain aerodynamics since most of the body is within the fairing bubble.
-- Instrumentation where it's impossible to see without taking eyes off the road
-- The fake-tank lines are ridiculous. Why not use that space for something? Even just a flat surface for a tankbag.
-- Those protuberances from the pack that are supposed to look like R-bike cylinder heads are supposedly cooling radiators, but they don't look very effective there (where's the surface area)?
-- No storage, or any way I can see to mount a rear carrier.
-- The design team is proud of a magnetic rucksack they came up with -- every riding instructor I ever met always cautioned against wearing backpacks, esp. in spirited riding: It makes for worse control, harder to do head checks, and in case of an accident, higher risk of back/spine damage.
-- No mudguards. Sure, not hard to add, but someone wasn't thinking of details.
I don't think it looks remotely like an R-bike (I did lots of miles on models from the 1970s & 1980s) -- it looks like designers who don't actually ride were told to do a design "inspired by the boxer". That's completely silly for a vehicle with no actual ICE. What made the original R-bikes, like the VW bug, neat, is the minimalistic function-dictates-form approach.
Oh, and BMW used to have a longstanding policy that they'd never publish a pic of bike with rider without ATTGATT, even though it made their ads & PR look nerdy compared to the competition; it's sad to see a pic of a bike at high speed with the rider wearing half-fingered gloves.