The Energica Esse Esse 9 battery is 11.7kWh nominal, while the Zero batteries were a 13kWh monolith and a 2.8kWh power tank which adds up to 15.8kWh marketing numbers and a 12.8kWh nominal. Similar. Brandon feels that the Energica battery feels about the same as the SR's 13 monolith without the power tank. Range is, of course, going to be a bit subjective on all the variables we've come to know and love like speed, weight, aero, etc. Both bikes were naked, and while the Energica is a bit heavier, Brandon is also much lighter than me and I was carrying a Givi case full of his backup portable charging stations in case he got stuck. Also my SR has the aforementioned Power Tank and 4 SuperChargers.
I'm pretty sure we normally charged up to 90% or more at each station. I was going until I hit voltage cutback unless it was a place I *knew* I needed every last watt. Likely the same for Brandon
You really have to acknowledge the cooling factor at play. Zero batteries retain heat because of the potting compound. The Energica ones do not, and in fact cool off rather quickly. Therefore Brandon was regularly punching it from station to station at 90+mph with not so much as a warning about battery temperature. I probably never went above 75 the whole trip home and my batteries were within 15 degrees of the bike shutting off.
I definitely want to see more bikes participate as well. It's a really fascinating time to be alive.