I recall that the reason that Brammo chose the Transmission is so they could gain some performance (with the same motor) by adding a transmission because you can put the motor into its power band whenever you want.
I "recall", um, and by that I mean have actual reference to discussions and quotes,
that there was a serious problem with the original Empulse overheating, which was one of the reasons the bike was delayed. At that point the possibilities came down to running a bigger motor, or working with a transmission, for the reasons you point out, Travis.
I also "recall" that Bramsher said that they were going to opt for a transmission primarily because they wanted to give the rider a familiar experience, and felt that it would help transition customers to electric with the 6-speed. This was all in the marketing info on the site and in interviews.
Now, what you believe to be the rationale and reasoning behind those two points is up to you - whatever Brammo cares (or cared) to spin.
Any claim to a significant advantage of a transmission is just silly at this point, considering the actual data we have. Minor advantages or disadvantages? Sure, haggle away on your personal preferences, but if it comes down to "does a bike need one to go fast?" Clearly not.
...and do I think this will be the last word on this discussion? Heavens, no.
Now, what is going to be interesting is if Victory decides to either stick with the transmission in future models or dump it. Guessing at what they're thinking, they have two bikes, the street bike and the race bike, one with, and one without a transmission. It's easy enough to repackage the street bike and see how it does with their market, and in a short time offer a bike without a transmission. In terms of Brammo's sales, however, that's a significant amount of market research already completed, and it's not a compelling conclusion. In any case, it's going to get interesting.
Add to that, Harley has been recruiting a few friends of mine pretty hard...