But that transmission is exactly why the Brammo has a higher top speed, and is not getting left in the dust by an SR with a less powerful motor.
It's not ideal, but Cycle World's instrumented tests (
2013 Empulse R vs 2013 Zero S,
2014 Zero SR) show otherwise. The Zero SR with a power tank (nearly the same weight as the Empulse) was half a second faster to 60 mph, and almost a full second faster through the quarter mile. A direct-drive system is a little less flexible than a multi-gear system, but both are compromises. That's why some Empulse owners (including Brian!) are
switching to a 42 tooth rear sprocket for faster low-speed acceleration at the expense of top speed.
2014 Zero SR w/ power tank: 450 pounds
30 front, 132 rear: 4.3s (CW tested), 102 mph top speed (spec)
25 front, 98 rear: 4.8s (extrapolate), 114 mph top speed (extrapolate assuming RPM-limited)
2013 Empulse R: 470 pounds
38 tooth rear: 4.8s (CW tested), 108 mph top speed (spec, 2014 R 110 mph)
42 tooth rear: 4.3s (extrapolate), 98 mph top speed (2014 R 100 mph .. possibly a little higher depending on motor power curve)
The 2014 Zero SR w/ Power Tank is a good match up against the Empulse R. Almost the same cost, almost the same weight. The Brammo delivers higher-spec components, onboard L2 charger, liquid cooling, higher top speed, multi-speed transmission, and a little bit of regular owner maintenance so gas owners don't have to quit cold turkey. The Zero SR delivers more power and stronger stock acceleration, 35-50% more range, lower maintenance (not counting glitches), app-tunable riding modes, etc.
Neither bike will sell to someone dead-set against electrics, but there's plenty of differentiation for both bikes to serve a unique market.