I'm still trying to figure out what problem this solution is supposed to solve. Shorter learning curve for the operator? That's hard to imagine since almost all kids learn how to ride bicycles, so countersteering is already pretty well-ingrained to just about every beginning motorcyclist.
I was thinking along the lines of Crissa, that maybe there's a reduced lean angle for a given turn radius, which would help keep things from grinding on the ground in tight turns, but I don't think that's true. The front wheel does lean harder into the curve than the bike, but the rear wheel leans less. And fundamentally, if the force vector determined by the weight of the bike+rider and the centripetal force of the turn doesn't go through the center of gravity of the bike+rider and the tire contact patch with the road, the bike is going to high-side or low-side. The bike's need to lean into the corner isn't affected. And I'd worry about the extreme lean angle of that front tire, as well....in a sharp turn, that front wheel is going to be nearly horizontal. Conventional motorcycle tires aren't designed for that.
Maybe it's less likely to crash since the rider doesn't have to coordinate lean angle and countersteer? That seems like a non-issue to me, as well. Given a competent rider, that's a very uncommon source of motorcycle accidents.
Dunno. I'm thinking this really is the result of someone over-thinking some not-really-a-problem issue. It does mention the lack of a need for countersteer, so maybe that really is the goal.
