It is regrettably economically infeasible for us to prepare a heater option in any reasonable amount of time (2017) that would be a UL-certifiable product, for numerous safety and configuration hassle reasons. We do not want to be held liable for an unsafe product. I have to make sure that the designer gets paid and we don't get sued or get a bunch of refund demands.
The prototypes we've tested are reasonable insulators if you leave the bike on the onboard charger overnight. TBH I've seen my battery temperature inch right near the upper limit on a ~60F evening because I was fast-charging near 1C with one of the thicker mockups around it, and I had to remove it to continue.
The primary role of this product is to preserve battery temperature and range while riding in the cold and the wet; it has been observed that rain on the case is easily the largest factor in range degradation.
If you want a heater, the wrap will accommodate a heating element underneath, and we're debating the ability to install it over the charger belly pan, which would leave room for a heater in a safer place than right on the batter casing but would dramatically increase wear and tear. So, maybe we'll suggest running a heater on the ground under the bike where the wrap "catches" it. But there's no way I'll do that officially without testing.
I would generally recommend that if you use a heater very close to the battery case that you document it and ensure it has a number of safeguards in place to prevent any issues while unattended.
Honestly, feedback about customers' use of heaters would be very helpful; understanding what wattage works in what ambient environments, and possibly seeing what someone considers safe enough for their own use, even when we can't certify it.
What I actually expect is that fewer customers will need a heater with this product than can be profitably supported.