That seems like a bit of a loaded question to me. You can't ask an engineer to design a product that's safe when it gets destroyed. In the final analysis, it's just not really possible.
First, anything that stores energy (a battery, a tankful of gasoline, etc.) can under some set of conditions release that energy way faster than intended. ICE vehicles and EVs can both catch on fire and "catastrophically deconstruct" in pretty dramatic fashion. Okay, you may say that there is a higher risk of electrocution for first responders trying to sort out an EV collision, but there's a lot lower risk of severe burns (fewer very hot parts) as well. And while we all know that pooled liquid gasoline doesn't actually burn very well, with lots of liquid gasoline lying around, in and on hot engine parts, there is a finite risk that somewhere in the air, the gasoline vapor will fall in between the lower explosive limit and upper explosive limit, and you'll have an explosion -- it does happen. First responders try to be very careful to avoid creating sparks whenever possible.
I'd say look at the track records. I don't know if there have really been enough incidents for a statistically valid comparison, but it certainly doesn't seem that EVs are significantly riskier to handle after an accident than ICEs, if at all. I know first responders are very concerned about it, but I think that's largely out of unfamiliarity and lack of guidelines, not any real elevated risk.