Richard,
thanks for the advice about the accessories!
windscreenI'm glad to hear you recommend a National Cycle windscreen, I had one on my Suzuki Savage (Boulevard S40) years ago and was very happy with it. I've always ridden the cruiser or scooter style with a windscreen and find that it saves me from sore arms fighting the wind. Because the Zero isn't a cruiser, I should try it without the screen to see if I can get used to the wind pressure in a streetbike posture.
In support of not using a windscreen, I'd heard from Mehve that she has experienced distracting pressure waves in her ear caused by turbulence behind the windscreen. I have not experienced this on my cruiser or scooter, but just in case, appreciate that National Cycle designs are easy to install and remove.
storageThe Givi E340 top case looks great. My scooter has a top case that I use for exactly that. $600 seems high, though. The rack itself Zero sells for $290 and the case Givi itself sells for $160, so that's a $150 markup.
powerI chose the heavy S because I am looking for only maximum range so that I can extend my riding envelope. I don't use much acceleration when I ride.
Like you, range rather than acceleration is the priority, so the power tank is a must. By getting the S instead of the SR, I'm saving $2,000 right off the bat, so might as well put that straight into the power tank ($2,500). Also, despite all of the recommendations in favor of the quick chargers, I feel that for a bike that is going to serve both everyday commuting and the occasional road trip,
CHAdeMO is the only practical solution in my area, which does have CHAdeMO stations along the routes I wish to travel.
charging vs. timeFor commuting, the advertised range of over 150 city miles is four times the range of my scooter, which I recharge daily. I might only have to recharge the S every Friday.
For my longer trips--day trips or weekend trips--I want to be delayed as little as possible by recharging stops. Even with two quick chargers,
the Zero S ZF14.2 takes over 5 hours to recharge to 100%, vs. 1.5 hours for CHAdeMO. Seriously? If I'm going to stop that long, I might as well stop overnight and let the bike get to 100% in 10 hours @ 120V.
charging vs. storageThen there's the storage issue. Let's imagine that instead of the CHAdeMO socket kit ($1,800), I take the advice to buy two
quick chargers ($1,200), Y adapter ($250), and extension cords ($40). That a savings of $200. With all of that extra charging gear in my top case or saddle bags, how much room is left to carry my toiletries, 2-3 days of clothing, and souvenirs? If the racks are standard enough, I could buy a larger set of saddle bags, but that would erase the $200 in savings, wouldn't it?
CHAdeMO vs. 2x quick chargeExcept for the non-zero possibility that the CHAdeMO DCFCs in my area are not compatible with the Zero, my user scenarios do not make the quick chargers compelling at all. Either I travel short distances that don't require recharging, or travel far enough that stopping for >5 hours to charge might as well be an overnight stay.
Zero vs. other brandI've put together a spreadsheet to help me compare the Zero S against other makes and models, but so far the Zero makes the most sense, assuming that I can rely on CHAdeMO. If I couldn't, then what's next on my stack rank? When I started this exercise, I really wanted the Brammo Empulse to be #2. Unfortunately, with a disappointing highway range of only 58 miles @ 70mph vs. Zero's 88, and no CHAdeMO support, it fell to #4, despite superior L2 support. What's in position 2? Don't laugh, but the
Lit C-1. Of course, that's based on numbers on paper for a product still under development that hasn't even been seen cornering. Wait, what's in position #3? Nothing: I might just stick with my commuter e-scooter until electric motorcycles can easily get over 150-200 miles of highway range.