The Verge torque is at the wheel, because that's where the motor is. Tesla torque, and pretty much every other vehicle EV or ICE, is at the motor. For comparison a DSR/X is 936Nm at the wheel, you'd get that up to 1030 if you swapped for the 20 tooth sprocket off a new DS (assuming it fit on the motor).
Interestingly an Ego/Eva RS comes out to 630 at the wheel, Energica claims 900 at the wheel for the Experia but multiplying the 115 at the motor by the 3.25 gearing gives 373. I know the wheel size also affects the torque so my calculations just ignore that and assume all the bikes have the same size wheel and I don't know the maths to go from torque on a tiny shaft to a much larger diameter tyre. But, if Energica are using a multiplication factor of 2.4 (and assuming Verge does too) then the DSR/X then becomes 2246Nm at the wheel and 1512 for the RS's.
You also need to take into account any gearing reduction inside the motor if you are trying to calculate rear wheel torque. Zero runs the front drive pully directly off the motor output, where as Energica uses additional reduction gears before the pinion shaft and final drive ratio.
Where are you pulling the data for Energica wheel torque from? These are the figures from the webpage:
EGO & EVA - 222 Nm torque / 164 lb-ft – 1187 Nm / 875 lb. ft at wheel
EsseEsse 9 - 207 Nm / 153 lb. ft – 1107 Nm / 816 lb. ft at wheel
Experia - 115 Nm / 85 ft lb. – 900 Nm / 664 ft lb. at wheel
Although the claims of the Verge providing 1000Nm of torque are accurate it's frustrating. News articles always focus on how that number is "so much bigger" without understanding why.
The most interesting aspect of the bike is the 2C charging, which is an industry first.
Lightning has demonstrated they can build a pack capable of 4C charging. I view that as more of a technology demonstrator vs. a production ready offering.
The max charge rate of a battery pack comes down to the capabilities of the cells used. You need to take into account the thermal limitations of the cells and the number of charge cycles before a noticeable reduction in capacity occurs. If you look at the data sheets for cells with super high charge rates the cycle life is normally 1/5th that of cells charged at 1C.
Would you rather have a motorcycle that charges at 2C but will loose 20% of the packs total capacity in 20k miles or one that charges at 1C that can do 100k before you see the same drop in capacity?