Princec.
" Wide tyres = softer rubber able to cope with torque. They don't offer more grip just because they're wide, it's because they can make the rubber softer and not get torn to shreds.
From a handling perspective, you want the narrowest tyres possible, with the absolute lightest unsprung weight you can get away with. 1kg off a wheel is worth 10kg off of anywhere else."
This is basically a completely incorrect statement.
The size of the contact patch is optimal for a tyre and motorcycle system. If the contact patch gets too big the pressure at the patch is less and there is less grip, and if too small the pressure is too high and the rubber will be overstressed and break grip.
Motorcycle lean, so the contact patch travels all over the tyre this helps keep the compound cooler and distribute the wear.
A larger tyre also is PART of the suspension. It does most of the micro vertical travel. The larger the tyre the more the tyre can deform to take up road surface variability. This is particularly important when leaned over and the suspension travel is effectively less compliant ( cos of included angle).
Narrower tyres are actually better for straight line speed ( for a number of reasons), not just areodynamics. See speed record attempts.
The big problem with going too wide or too narrow is the SHAPE and position of the contact patch .
You are correct about the importance of unsprung weight though, which is why hub motors on motorcycles are not such a great idea. The wheel weight relative to total system weight is much higher than most powered vehicles, so is extremely important to dynamic handling.
BTW wider does not necessarily mean lighter. On one of my smaller racing motorcycles I had a problem getting a tyre. I needed a 150/60 but could only get a 130/80. The 130/80 was 2kg heavier than the 150/60! Needless to say it didn't stay on long...
And yes wheel/hub has huge benefits over everything else so far. But never underestimate the innovation potential of humans.