You mention a good compromise on some characteristics. I have been thinking about that lately. I considered the different bikes I have ridden. Then I went to the shop and sat on the KTM350 dual sport and then on the Honda 250 dual sport next to it. The long wheelbase of the 350 and the terrible seat that dug into the sides of my legs was quite noticeable. As far as dimensions go, I think the Freeride dimensions are better. Freeride has much shorter wheelbase 55.8, compared to KTM 350 dual sport 58.3 or Alta's 58.6. I really did not like the big bike feel of the 350 dual sport. I started to think about the bikes I have ridden because I was thinking about how the rake and trail effect handling in tight stuff. But the crf230 does not have as small a rake as other bikes, I was surprised when I looked, yet it has good slow speed turning. I figure the 54.1 wheelbase must also play a big part. I looked at the numbers for other bikes, klx250, drz400, kx250f, wr250f. I concluded I have a more favorable ride experience on the shorter and smaller bikes. Sure the kx250f is light weight so does work well in trails, but it still doesn't have the trail bike feel. It has that big bike feel even though it is so light. I think KTM's free ride bike line is a great size. However, they don't want to sell them in the USA. The website only has the Freeride E. I like the e-bikes for sure, but I was thinking gas due to the range and dual sport. Alta's is dual sport but I know it will have that big bike feel. They adjusted the rake for their dual sport, so that will help but I doubt it will feel as nimble as the KTM freeride e. I often overthink things, but in this case I really think I noticed the trend of what size bike I am looking for, and it's not a full size mx bike.