ps. I'm trading my 2011 Zero S for a ZF9 2012 tomorrow via a dealer. Love it but I'll love the 2012 even more.
Curious what kind of trade in value you were offered? As a 2011S owner I am tempted, but imagine the depreciation hit is pretty bad...
I wouldn't say "depreciation hit" rather I'd say "depreciation bloodbath."
If you double the performance of any product from one model year to the next you'd expect to take a 50% depreciation loss... and you'd be right.
The problem is not that the 2001 S was bad, the problem is that the 2012 S is so good. Even compared to the fictitious Brammo Empulse nothing comes close.
Just got back from my first 2012 S ZF9 ride since delivery this AM. First impressions:
1. A 35 mile ride that typically left me staring at two flashing bars as I approached my driveway today left me with 7 bars. I could have gone at least another 60 miles
2. A jogging fat man could beat my 2011 S off the line. Sport mode on the 2012 makes the bike fast enough that I can finally get off the line and safely in front of traffic, and accelerate reliably out of harm's way. I accelerated full throttle off the line every time today. Didn't seem to hurt the range. What's eco mode for?
3. I could feel the extra 40 lbs and I like it. They use the battery weight to move the center of mass lower to make the bike more stable and maneuverable, and less prone to get blown around in the wind
4. The ride is heavier and that's a good thing. The harshness of rough roads is smoothed out somewhat vs the 2011.
Bottom line, the bike is as fast and maneuverable as any 250CC ICE bike I've ridden. As for range, I'd get tired from riding before the battery gives out after 5 to 7 hours.
If you can stomach the depreciation, run don't walk to buy an upgrade.